Random Card of the Day

Friday, February 24, 2017

Set: 2006 Topps 1952 Edition - Debut Flashbacks (Rate)

Card: #DF12 David Wright

“ Like most things in this current culture, we go back to what was awesome/worked instead of creating something new. ” -hphillips

“ I like the way the 1952 Edition looks and feels like an older card. So if you have some 1952's enjoy The Nostalgia on the card ” -BBJUNKIE

“ Classic is written all over this particular card, not perfect, but classic. The player is the primary focus as he occupies a generous amount of space with the design features taking a backseat. The offset logo over the nameplate along with it not being an action shot keep it from perfection. ” -Sportzcommish

“ Injuries have derailed his very nice career. ” -carthage44

“ Nice retro set. I like when Topps does Heritage, but wish they would cut out all the inserts for those sets. As with the flagship sets they do not need 100 insert sets or 100 parallels. I used to like Archives as well, but that has gotten out of hand and it is now confusing when you get a lone card from one of these retro sets. Back to this specific card the 1952 Topps design is one of the most classic the front was simple and gave you most of what was needed full player name team logo and the players facsimile autograph. Often the "autograph" was not even close to how the player actually signed their name, but before the modern era of "certified" autographs the facsimiles were the way to go. I didn't mind them back in the day, but now with autographs being a key feature of modern collecting having the facsimile autograph PLUS an in-person or TTM autograph is overkill. The back is also pretty faithful to the original 52 design. ” -captkirk42

“ The more I look at it, the more I like it... ” -DarkSide830

“ These are pretty neat, but as someone who was out of the hobby, the "52 Edition" moniker was a bit confusing. Especially since Topps had already had Heritage sets. ” -marcbrubaker

“ I never can tell if I like the flashback stuff or not. Maybe I'll never decide. I will say this card looks nice. David Wright could have been so much more without the injuries. ” -muskie027

“ Ooh, I like this design. I see it's an insert, but it's actually really pleasing to the eye ” -jasongerman9

Continue the conversation...

Thursday, February 23, 2017

Set: 2010 Rittenhouse The Quotable Star Trek Movies (Rate)

Card: #38 James T. Kirk / Leonard McCoy

“ This. Is. A. Cool. Card. ” -uncaian

“ A card with two backs. Not interested. ” -Sportzcommish

“ If you look close enough, you can see Ben Grieve hidden in the background. ” -Brimose

“ LIke Trek. I never saw what the big deal was about these "quotable" sets? I was confused the first time I saw/heard about a "quotable" set. I thought they were some special audio disc type card along the lines of the "talking baseball cards" from the early 1990s that was a fad for a year or two. I'm also not a fan of the double fronted card. Not for any set. ” -captkirk42

“ So weak ” -NJDevils

“ One of the best parts of my Saturday: watching re-runs of the original Star Trek episodes. I haven't watched many of the movies though... ” -DarkSide830

“ Star Trek - a legend like no other. The New York Yankees of cinema! ” -jayoneill

“ Not loving it. Move sets are tough. I like the quotes, just not how they take up so much of the card. Oh well, live long and prosper! ” -muskie027

“ There are much better Star Trek cards out there than this. ” -DanD

“ snooze ” -hphillips

Continue the conversation...

Wednesday, February 22, 2017

Set: 1995-96 Topps (Rate)

Card: #1 Michael Jordan

“ Don't believe there will ever be another basketball player as great as MJ. The man was an artist and a thrill to see play live. ” -hphillips

“ Nice one. Great player and looks like he's hanging there. Some rock climbing action. If I'd collect basketball, Bulls would be the team. ” -Duke

“ For some very odd reason, I like the front of this card. However I can't stand the back. ” -jupiterhill

“ Not too often we have a card #1 as card of the day, even rarer when it's one that resides in my collection. Also a rare photo angle to see on a card. Not a bed subset, another rarity-active leaders instead of last season's leaders (their subset came immediately after this one) ” -Billy Kingsley

“ Cool a Michael Jordan clock card. Looks to be almost 5 o'clock? OH just a new take on the old leader cards for the first 10 cards or so. ” -captkirk42

“ THE WORST IDEA in trading card history - the overhead view! I've yet to see a card that appeals to me with from this perspective. (Some are in my Want List, but that's because of the player not the design.) ” -Sportzcommish

“ Would be a much better action photo if it didn't have it superimposed on the graphic. The over rim photos are cool but only when they are unedited. GOAT is not overused with MJ, although I didn't fully appreciate him until after he retired since I was a Celtics fan and didn't like the Bulls growing up. ” -Brimose

“ Cool...a card #1 of a set...and a Michael Jordan to boot! What's not to like! Okay, maybe the card itself, but I still like it! ” -bkklaos

“ It's not even close. For active scorers, Jordan is more than 6 points more per game in his career, at the point this card was printed, than 2nd place Karl Malone. Jordan is the best player of all-time, PERIOD! ” -carthage44

“ Love the photography on this one. Amazing shot. Also, I like how the star of the league is card #1, even if it is some type of league leaders card ” -jasongerman9

“ Cool shot, and the background design frames Jordan nicely. ” -Shadowmangmr

“ The framing on this picture is excellent. A fitting image for Air Jordan ” -ketchupman36

“ Jordan is a Legend. Are the corners dinged up or is there an issue with the scan? Might be fixed by the time this is card of the day anyway. Some of the back is kind of hard to read but I think it might be the scan. I recall liking this card more in person. ” -Mitch

“ Is this a screenshot from Space Jam ? ” -uncaian

“ I remember this.....unfortunately. ” -NJDevils

“ Nice to see a legend on a card, albeit, not much of him. I like the scoring leader card in sets, but the picture on this one is rough, even if it is of MJ. As a scoring leader card and not the actual base player card, I like the design and the business, I think that works for special segments of cards in sets, but this card could have been better if the picture was on a slightly better angle. ” -muskie027

Continue the conversation...

Tuesday, February 21, 2017

Set: 2002 Grandstand Mobile BayBears (Rate)

Card: #20 Johnny Hunter

“ I like it. Nice design, a well done back and a great scan. This one's a winner! ” -Billy Kingsley

“ Nice appealing design that keeps up with the big boys. The only improvement would be the name plate as the style used would be better served on the back. ” -Sportzcommish

“ I think this has everything you could ask for in a baseball card, and it's even a minor league one! I'm really impressed with most of what Grandstand has issued, especially these that are original designs (they have been known to use old Topps designs with very small variations). This one is VERY nice. ” -vrooomed

“ Album of the Year. "Johnny Hunter-Pitching for your Love" ” -sahal694

“ Nice card. ” -carthage44

“ Looks like a glamour shot / school pictures pose. Certainly not the typical minor league card from the 90s. ” -Mitch

“ Minor League Baseball! My favorite! Don't care for how they put the name in the upper left. And I always hated how minor league hats from the 1990s-early 2000s always tried to fit so much information on the cap; logo and nickname? Really? ” -jasongerman9

“ Very nice minor league card. Beats a lot of what Topps and UD and Panini put out. ” -NJDevils

“ I wonder how many teams make their name by just having the word "Bay" plus a random mascot. What even is a bay bear? ” -lxnlxn

“ This is the first I've seen of these cards and I like them. This is a great looking minor league team set. ” -cynicalbuddha

“ Nice MILB card. With the two photos on front looks like a 1990s Fleer or Upper Deck set. Back is nice. ” -captkirk42

“ Anyone else notice that the minor league cards seem to be far and away better designs than the major league cards? I might switch the sizes of the portrait vs in-action shot, but other than that, great design. ” -hphillips

“ At first, I hated it, but then, just staring at it, I turned my thoughts around pretty quickly. As a minor league card, I actually like it, and the back is better than most minor league sets. As a pro set, not sure I would feel the same, but I rather like this. Even the odd dual picture, one action in black and white and one portrait in color isn't making me hate it like it should. ” -muskie027

“ What ridiculous photos minor league cards have. ” -Quinn820

Continue the conversation...

Monday, February 20, 2017

Set: 2000 Topps Pokemon TV Animation Edition Series 3 (Rate)

Card: #120 Staryu

“ The card and comic book shop killer..... ” -hphillips

“ ACK! I don't do Pokemon. This is from the animated series based on the card game, that involves the card game. ” -captkirk42

“ One of my favorite cards of a starfish in a bedazzled backpack. ” -UKboogie

“ My seven year old, like many his age, is into Pokemon. Watching the XY Cartoon with him a few weeks ago this occurred to me...They have these cute animal creatures as pets, and train them and use them to battle each other. Basically it is a huge accepted dog fighting ring. ” -rmpaq5

“ Oh man how I hate Topps Pokemon cards. When I was a kid in 1999, Pokemon cards were the thing to have. My mom never bought me any cards so I was only able to create a collection of cards that my friends had given me. For Christmas 1999, I got my mom to by me a box of Pokemon cards so I could be able to show them off and play with my friends. Much to my dismay on the morning of 12/25/1999, I opened pack after pack of Topps Pokemon cards, not the real deal Pokemon Trading Card Game. What a bait and switch by Topps to fool mothers into buying this crap! lol Still never ended up getting any packs or boxes of Pokemon cards after that. Don't even get me started on the knockoff brand scooter I got the next year! haha ” -sahal694

“ I refuse to comment on this series of cards and thus perpetuate the silliness that is Pokemon. I wish it would go away, just like this Geodude that just disappeared before I could capture him on Pokemon Go!! ” -Sportzcommish

“ The names of Pokemon are hilarious and not creative. ” -carthage44

“ So why is there a #120 in front of Staryu? Is #120 part of Staryu's name? Are there another 119 different Staryu's? Why does every Pokemon in this set listing have a # as part of its name? ” -C2Cigars

“ Oh, can it be? The thing from 50's japanese scifi movie Warning from space (Uchujin Tokyo ni arawaru). ” -Duke

“ I have no words to describe this. ” -muskie027

Continue the conversation...

Sunday, February 19, 2017

Set: 2015 Topps Gypsy Queen (Rate)

Card: #179b James Shields

“ Not a huge Gypsy Queen fan, but this isn't bad. I like the photo and the overall design. I hate the lack of a first name on the front, and if the Gypsy Queen logo was actually the team logo, this would be real nice. ” -muskie027

“ Gypsy Queen is growing on me. This is not one of the better years. When Topps first revived the GQ brand I HATED it. Thought the border was too dark and looked too much like an attempt at the Upper Deck Masterpieces Framed cards. I like it sometimes now. I have grown tired of the mini parallels from this and A&G. ” -captkirk42

“ Hey, look, He's singing along with Snoopy! ” -Billy Kingsley

“ So glad the White Sox have this guy.... NOT!!! ” -carthage44

“ One of the better Gypsy Queen designs that takes just enough border and maximizes the player's picture. Even with the dull dual colors they chose for the 2015 series works to make an attractive card. ” -Sportzcommish

“ I bought a lot of retail packs of this set from the Seattle Mariners team store as they were always on discount. It's a decent looking set. ” -ketchupman36

“ HATE the card design and the pose. ” -cjjt

“ Still love the Gypsy Queens, as I've mentioned before. Great signature cards like the A&G for autograph collectors. Something about the texture and the photography. ” -jasongerman9

“ My face when I see how cool the Gypsy Queen logo is ” -lxnlxn

“ Interesting look on his face. I've always liked the look of gypsy queen cards. ” -Mitch

“ nope ” -hphillips

Continue the conversation...

Saturday, February 18, 2017

Set: 1990 CMC (Rate)

Card: #722 Frank Valdez

“ Don't know what is more hideous, the uniform or the design of this card. Plus, red batting glove?! ” -hphillips

“ Cool name for a team. Interesting to see two logos on the same card. I really like the minor league cards I've seen come up as Card of the Day.great scan too, at least the front. Haven't figured out how to see the back on my tablet yet without clicking on the card, but I don't want to have to type this twice, LOL ” -Billy Kingsley

“ Loved these ProCards minor league sets. ” -carthage44

“ Very nice for a minor league design. Why do Florida teams love to stick "Rays" in their name? ” -muskie027

“ Talk about a screwy set(s). Who would know to look for 1990 ProCards #1094 in 1990 CMC #722. But of course it's also listed in 1990 ProCards. If you ask me these are a headache because the CMC and ProCards came in the same packs. ” -C2Cigars

“ The wood-grain border reminds me of the 1987 Topps set, although not quite as eye-catching. One spot of confusion...TCDB lists this as card #722; meanwhile, on the back of the card in the upper left, it says "1094". I see in the lower right on the back the "722". Anyone have any idea what that means? ” -jasongerman9

“ The Pro-Cards designs have never done it for me. I know they are minor leaguers, but it just comes off as something your kid gets after picture day. The backs seem to have wasted space, but then again minor leaguers sometimes don't have a lot of stats. Maybe some personal information blurbs would help the back out. On a side not I think Frank needs a smaller, or at least shorter, hat. ” -rmpaq5

“ Just remembered that I was on a youth basketball team when I was about 5 called the Sunrays. At the time I thought we were the Sun Raise and thought that was really stupid. ” -sahal694

“ And we are back to 1990s MILB cards. I kind of like this set. Looks sort of like a Hall of Fame plaque design. Back is very 1980s looking. ” -captkirk42

“ Wow - how did CMC use ProCards' design like that and get away with it. The ProCards logo on the front, and the ProCards number is still on the back too. Strange. I don't remember the whole story behind that. Hopefully, someone will fill us in. I was too busy doing our own minor league sets in 1990 (Star Co) to have followed too closely. :) ” -vrooomed

Continue the conversation...

Friday, February 17, 2017

Set: 1993-94 Panini Stickers (Rate)

Card: #250 Keith Primeau

“ overly designed (did an engineer do this?) and bland ” -hphillips

“ I have never liked these Panini stickers that are ment to put on an album. I don't personally consider them even to be collectible cards. I have some of them in my Blackhawks collection, but those have been freebies or I have bought bigger bundle and Panini stickers have just been part of that bundle. Don't like 'em and wouldn't mind if they disappear from database. ” -Duke

“ Tough dude , strong force for the Wings . I'm not a big collector of the stickers , but this set wasn't too bad. ” -uncaian

“ Great for kids but once you peal them off, they lose whatever little value they had. As a kid I loved these, as a collector I hate them. ” -carthage44

“ Nice look except I do not like vertical text. Sometimes I wish Panini has stayed with just doing stickers and that Donruss was still around as its OWN company not a revival brand from a different company. ” -captkirk42

“ Not bad design wise. Clearly 1990s but that's a good thing. ” -Billy Kingsley

“ I collected so many Panini hockey stickers as a kid, including this year. ” -wax_house

“ Never seen Panini hockey stickers before. Guess I should have expected it though. I like their tip on the back! ” -jasongerman9

“ Aww man, I wish I had me some double stickers so I could have friends...and have fun too! ” -sahal694

“ A decent sticker, though the photo could have been bigger. Primeau was a beast! ” -dilemma19

“ Cousin Keith? Sorry, wrong language. ” -Sportzcommish

“ Exactly Panini, you only trade your doubles. Don't get convinced into trading your singles. You will never get one again. Trust me, the only single I ever traded away I haven't been able to re-pull since... ” -DarkSide830

“ Brrr!!! Looks chilly. ” -RoundtheDiamond87

“ The sticker definitely seems to be the from the same company that makes calculus textbooks. Neat? ” -lxnlxn

Continue the conversation...

Thursday, February 16, 2017

Set: 2000 Upper Deck MVP - Silver Script (Rate)

Card: #15 Ben Grieve

“ Ben Grieve is on fire. He just had card of the day while ago. How many cards he has in database? ” -Duke

“ Classic hitter's pose, but not a classic card. The design looks like a generic attempt from a George Orwell wannabe from the 50's predicting what the 21st century would be like. ” -Sportzcommish

“ Wow, two Ben Grieve basic Upper Deck parallels in three days! Can this go on Admins coincidence list? ” -rmpaq5

“ Wow, another Ben Grieve. Overrated prospect. ” -carthage44

“ Hey, good for Ben to get two RCOTD in a week! ” -Brimose

“ Didn't we just have a Ben Grieve card recently? Popular fella. ” -sahal694

“ I think I have voiced my dislike for the Upper Deck MVP sets. This one looks like it was inspired by computer circuit boards or old fashioned data punch cards. Oddly the foil lettering on this card can be read in this scan. Don't like the vertical lettering at least you can read the player name and team name with little problem. Back a bit messy and more of that circuit punch card look. Blah. ACK card number is vertical. ” -captkirk42

“ Another Ben Grieve card; we just had one of these! This card is way too busy for me; too much going on. Always did like the silver signature parallels on Upper Deck products though. ” -jasongerman9

“ More Ben Grieve parallel goodness! He certainly had a lot of hype, but I wouldn't say he was a total bust. 1998 ROY, solid hitter but couldn't get out of his own way in the field. ” -tenlbpain

“ Hey, we just had Ben Grieve on 8 Feb. No matter what the sport, Upper Deck MVP gets the "thumbs down". ” -C2Cigars

“ Wow, Ben Grieve is HOT this month!!! Let's see, in this version, I am left dizzy as there is WAY too much going on. An Oakland here, and MVP there, a Silver Script here, a name there, an auto in the bottom middle, a position by the knee, another MVP across the shins, some etching at the bottom. And there is still more. Somehow, they got the player to pop and stand out, so I give them credit for that. The back is mediocre. Overall, I think way too much is going on in this card. ” -muskie027

“ Benny boy's been getting the MVP treatment lately... ” -DarkSide830

“ Decent design, seems to have some wasted space ” -hphillips

Continue the conversation...

Wednesday, February 15, 2017

Set: 2002-03 Be a Player Memorabilia (Rate)

Card: #121 Mark Parrish

“ Very simple front, and it works for me. Back is good and gives some nice anecdote information. I like. ” -rmpaq5

“ Not a bad card nice picture, good stats on back .Parrish was a pretty good player , very reliable. ” -uncaian

“ He looks like my son-in-law on skates, rather shaky and soon to fall at any moment. Maybe this photo was taken after a hard check? ” -Sportzcommish

“ not bad...i am not a huge fan of the placement of the number on the bottom middle. ” -Billy Kingsley

“ What brand is this? Be a Player brand? ” -carthage44

“ Clean design. Lots text on the back (as opposed to blank space). I like it. ” -cjjt

“ Mighty bland. ” -NJDevils

“ I think my favorite thing about this scan is that if you move your cursor over it to show the reverse side, the "Be A Player" in the upper right corner doesn't move; it just gets darker on the back. Very pleasing to the eye. ” -jasongerman9

“ Fairly underwhelming. ” -DarkSide830

“ Reminds me of 1990 Pro Set football. Not quite sure why there wasn't a better effort on the gray 'Memorabilia' stripe. This card would be pretty good if not for that and the micro font on the name. The back is lacking in a couple areas. Overall all, a very mediocre effort that could have been a well done effort with minor changes. ” -muskie027

Continue the conversation...



Copyright © 2017
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.