Posted By | Message |
jupiterhill
Posts: 1,229
Joined: Jun 2013
|
Saturday, August 1, 2015 3:24 AM | |
So I stumbled across these cards that Hallmark made for their Paw Star Game. There are 30 cards all featuring a different feline. My question is would these go in non-sport, or in baseball. I have doubt because they are all baseball related so its possible they could go into baseball.
The Hallmark site has a picture of 30 cards (I assume that's the full set) and you can buy packs for 5 bucks a pack. I think its kinda cool but a little too much.
-------------------------------
Royal Card Review is my blog if you feel like checking it out, thanks if you do!- royalcardreview.blogspot.com/ In the process of updating my collection so don't trust any of my lists right now.
|
|
|
|
lxnlxn
Posts: 20
Joined: Jul 2015
|
Tuesday, August 4, 2015 7:30 AM | |
These are definitely non-sport.
|
|
|
|
jimmyjam
Posts: 114
Joined: May 2008
|
Tuesday, August 4, 2015 12:17 PM | |
I vote baseball because they are baseball related.
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
RiverCity
Posts: 28
Joined: Dec 2014
|
Tuesday, August 4, 2015 12:30 PM | |
I'd say their purrfect for non-sport
|
|
|
|
switzr1
Posts: 6,332
Joined: Dec 2013
|
Tuesday, August 4, 2015 12:37 PM | |
My vote is non-sport. I have no idea what the paw star game is, but I refuse to believe that this cat can hold a bat.
-------------------------------
I'm going to reevaluate how I collect after the new year. It's just getting way too expensive for the new stuff. Sometimes I just want to buy a pack, not a whole box or even blaster.
|
|
|
|
jimmyjam
Posts: 114
Joined: May 2008
|
Tuesday, August 4, 2015 1:14 PM | |
That cat, with it's small strike zone could at least get to first base. From there, it's up in the air. Maybe the third base coach would have to jiggle treats or something.
Non-sport should mean there are no sports to be seen anywhere on the card. I'm seeing baseballs on there and even a team name, albeit fictitious. The only thing that's throwing it off is the position on back. There's no 1st Beast in real baseball.
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
sandyrusty
Posts: 4,645
Joined: Dec 2014
|
Thursday, August 6, 2015 3:53 AM | |
Non-sport. Jimmyjam, if I take your reasoning, should we move the 1987/88 Alf Bouillabaseball sets to baseball?
-------------------------------
Bruno -------- Check my Profile page to see my 2023 Goals and my Lists of sets near completion (5 cards or less) or sets getting close (less than 100 cards missing and 75% complete). https://www.tcdb.com/Forum.cfm/Page/B/ID/0/?MODE=VIEW&ThreadID=25745&C=0
|
|
|
|
jimmyjam
Posts: 114
Joined: May 2008
|
Thursday, August 6, 2015 5:12 AM | |
Bouillabaseball is in insert set under a non-sport set, so definitely not.
Plus Bouillabaseball is not the same sport as Baseball as they're launching fish around.
Thinking from the perspective of someone who might have these cards and searching for them in the database, they're thinking, "I have baseball cards with cats on them." So the natural inclination might be to look under baseball. Non-sport seems counterintuitive as they are sports related. The only thing that is making me reconsider is the "first beast" position on back. As this position doesn't exist in real baseball, now we're talking about some offshoot sport.
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Billy Kingsley
Posts: 7,512
Joined: Aug 2011
|
|
|
|
bkklaos
Posts: 83
Joined: Dec 2012
|
Thursday, August 6, 2015 8:11 AM | |
I would have to join the bandwagon of non-sport. Although I understand jimmyjam's reasoning of someone looking in "sport" first when trying to add to their collection, hopefully they would check "non-sport" before creating a checklist in baseball. To me a sports card is a real person and a real sport together. The one exception (to which I agree) is for "sports pun" cards that change a real players name for a real sport (NBA & MLB sets come to mind). My two cents... Brian
|
|
|
|