Card Identification Forum

Okay, I'm preparing a checklist for a team set for a team in an independent league (Can-Am League). I've shown two backs, one from a player that has his player number as the only identifiable number, and another from a coach without a number on the back. (The manager and the other coach have their uniform numbers on the back.)

Technically the uniform numbers are not card numbers, should I just list them all alphabetically as NNO? Or should I list all the cards by the uniform numbers on the back, as that is the only number on the back of the card, and then put the one coach with NNO at the bottom? I've seen both methods in use in the database.

Personally, I would list them all as NNO. I think listing the cards in alphabetical order is good. I recently entered an insert checklist that had no card numbers. I listed the individuals alphabetically. 

NNO

I would do NNO1, NNO2, etc.. as the checklist numbers, but maybe for constancy, but put the cards in alphabetical order of their last name. Just my take.

grim25

All should be NNO (not NNO1, NNO2, etc.) and alphabetical order is preferred.

NNO

NNO