Card Identification Forum

The only numbers on the card are the uniform numbers on the front so I was thinking NNO for the checklist but then I looked at the back of Torre's card and it seems to be a checklist listing the cards by uniform number. So should I use the uniform numbers as card numbers because of the Torre card looking like a checklist?

The prefered protocall is in alphabetical order NNO. Using the uniform numbers would cause confusion. It looks to be a 30 card set the largest uniform number is 55 so people might think some cards are missing from the list or from their collection.

As long as it is not Beckett's generic 1-30 numbering, I think either NNO or the uniform numbering works.  I don't see what is confusing about using #55 for a card that has #55 on it if that is the only visible number.

These are clearly numbers. Nobody would be confused by these. It'd be pretty obvious to anybody looking at the checklist that it was a skipnumbered set. That's actually much more common than most people probably realize.

I have several Kansas City Royals Police Sets and had asked Admin if the sets should go by the uniform numbers or be labeled as NNO. The answer I received was NNO.

Oh, and also that they should be listed alphabetically.