Posted By | Message |
jasongerman9
Posts: 1,902
Joined: Jan 2015
|
Thursday, August 31, 2017 10:50 AM | |
Cards #353-360 in this set are checklist cards, each checklist (except for 360, Rookies) has four team checklists on it. So, should these checklists be filed under each of those four teams? It would seem to make sense to me to do it that way, but I don't ever recall reading how it should be done. Thanks!
Jason
-------------------------------
I'll never quit collecting entirely, but I am downsizing. Check out my COMC store and help me thin out what I don't want so I can buy cards that I do want. See something you like? Send me a message on here, and we can knock the price down quite a bit. I'll even take a bit of a loss if it means getting you a card you really want.
|
|
|
|
grim25
Posts: 559
Joined: Jan 2013
|
Thursday, August 31, 2017 11:57 AM | |
My two cents on this, since they are checklists, put them as No Team.
|
|
|
|
kcjays
Posts: 743
Joined: Jan 2012
|
Thursday, August 31, 2017 12:09 PM | |
Some of the Fleer and Ultra baseball checklists that are like this and linked to the teams listed.
My two cents: Personally, as a Royals team collector, I like this. For me, if the Royals are specifically listed on the checklist, I want to include the checklist with the cards. However, I certaily see "the other side of the coin".
|
|
|
|
ranfordfan
Posts: 4,975
Joined: Jun 2014
|
Thursday, August 31, 2017 12:47 PM | |
I do believe the rule of thumb is No Team as a matter of simplicity for the DB. If we start adding several teams to a checklist then where do we stop? It is somewhat the same as the multiple players on a In Action card, how many player names and team names do you add before you make the cutoff, I was doing it and was told by Admin it is not needed. I still cheated on two cards I think. =O
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
C2Cigars
Posts: 11,437
Joined: Oct 2014
|
Thursday, August 31, 2017 12:57 PM | |
These cards should have the teams. They are Team Checklist cards. Check the Change Log and you can see members have been changing them back and forth.
-------------------------------
Someday my cards may double in value and then be worth half of what I paid for them.
|
|
|
|
ranfordfan
Posts: 4,975
Joined: Jun 2014
|
Thursday, August 31, 2017 1:04 PM | |
I thought a Team Checklist card was to be a single team on the card. Ultra (hockey) I think has each checklist done by team and I never updated, the card numbers are all random if I remember correctly as they are done alphabetically (???) Anyways I have also seen cards with as many as 6, 8 even 10 teams per card .... these are to be linked as well?
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
vrooomed
Posts: 14,911
Joined: Dec 2012
|
Thursday, August 31, 2017 2:34 PM | |
For checklists that are this clear cut as to which teams are on it, they should have those teams in the Team field, and subsequently linked. We have been doing that with the Fleer (baseball) checklists since 1981 (2 teams on those). Generic, sequential checklists, where the cards are not grouped by teams should get "No Team".
-------------------------------
-- Dan -- Note: Please see my profile for more info regarding trading (section updated 3/4/2024). I have added a large portion of my inventory to the site, and currently have trading turned on (details are in my profile).
|
|
|
|
jasongerman9
Posts: 1,902
Joined: Jan 2015
|
Thursday, August 31, 2017 2:56 PM | |
My thoughts were based off of the 1988 Fleer baseball checklists, for which the teams are listed (as previously mentioned).
-------------------------------
I'll never quit collecting entirely, but I am downsizing. Check out my COMC store and help me thin out what I don't want so I can buy cards that I do want. See something you like? Send me a message on here, and we can knock the price down quite a bit. I'll even take a bit of a loss if it means getting you a card you really want.
|
|
|
|
ranfordfan
Posts: 4,975
Joined: Jun 2014
|
Thursday, August 31, 2017 4:22 PM | |
Lesson learned. Ooooops. =(
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
jasongerman9
Posts: 1,902
Joined: Jan 2015
|
Thursday, August 31, 2017 7:45 PM | |
Going to briefly hijack this thread for another set to get clarification. What about the 1993 Ted Williams set? This checklist has 12 different teams listed on it. Do we list all 12? Or is there a cutoff where we just leave it as "No Team"?
-------------------------------
I'll never quit collecting entirely, but I am downsizing. Check out my COMC store and help me thin out what I don't want so I can buy cards that I do want. See something you like? Send me a message on here, and we can knock the price down quite a bit. I'll even take a bit of a loss if it means getting you a card you really want.
|
|
|
|