1992 Classic II Baseball Forum

When I went to enter the last missing images of this set, I found that the 4-in-1 card was missing as well as the set was listed as 99 cards.  Asking Admin, they advised that the 4-in-1 card was listed as an insert.  I now have found many of the Classic sets to be this way but not all.  Some have it at the end of the checklist but show 99 cards in the set when the 4-in-1 card is NNO but card 100.

Question: Is it really an Insert?  When you bought these Classic sets, every set has one of these in them.  Most guides list them as an NNO card but part of the set.  Should this be corrected not only for this set, but for all Classic sets where this occurs?  I personally did not find the card on my own as I would have never considered it to be anything but a card of the original set.

Thoughts?

The 1992 Classic II baseball is a trivia board game. They featured 99 standard-size player trivia cards, one "4-in-1" micro player card, a gameboard, and a spinner. The 4-in-1 is part of the game; meant to be separated and used as player pieces. So, it should be listed as part of the set.

My bigger question is why are all the 1992 Classic games listed under Major Releases and not Oddball?

My thoughts: if it's not numbered as card 100 then it isn't card 100.  No number, then I agree with Admin, put it as an insert. 

Switzr1 - that is the problem, it does not show up at the end of the set.  It is listed as an insert set.  I think most people who have these sets count it as card 100.  When you buy a Classic set it advertises as e.g.100 cards not 99 cards and one insert.  I did not find this card listed on my own.  I notified admin that there was a card missing from the checklist and they are the ones who told me that it was listed under insert or parallel sets.

I rescinded my prior question because I cannot find an example of what I thought I had seen.