Random Card of the Day



Tuesday, March 2, 2021

Set: 2000 Finest (Rate)

Card: #34 Steve Young


“ I like the design of this card. ” -Brendan Barrick
  1
“ was Steve Young under appreciated? as the 49ers QB after Joe Montana, he always seemed to have a Joe shadow over him, or am I misremembering? he's 7x pro bowl, 2x MVP, HOF, but he didn't get a ring as a starter, and Joe got 4. ” -abide
  4
“ Wow I love this. I’m not familiar with Finest but this is really cool, they fit in a lot of details without obscuring the player or his name. ” -pugchump
  1
“ When I sort my card scans I usually make them pretty small, small enough that I actually feel sine eyestrain if I do too much. If it's a card I'm not overly familiar with I sometimes can't tell what team it is. That would never be the case with these cards! ” -Billy Kingsley

“ Finest sets are pretty nice. Just wish they would scan better. ” -MattyIce2014
  1
“ From back when I liked the niners..... Young to Owens was an amazing combo. Great looking card. Didnt realize 2000 young was still playing. ” -parsley24

“ I always liked finest. Especially back then Cards looked nice and I believe they even had a peel off cover as well ” -mkb

“ Hey, something other than a non-sport RCotD for me! A bit awkward shot of Steve, but I still like it! I grew up a 49ers fan, even though I grew up in the Seattle area! Once the Hawks came along, my loyalty changed and been a homer Hawks fan ever since! But still always a soft spot for the Niners, despite being a division opponent since the change from AFC to NFC! ” -bkklaos
  1
“ This card is so ugly it is actually nice . . . There's a throwback feeling to the image on the front, making it seem nostalgic even though it may not actually be . . .The back looks as if it has been run over several times by a bus . . . For some reason, there's something that feels "nice" about that . . . ” -georgecf

“ Man cards were really evolving during the late 90's early 00's. Perfect example. ” -Madden95

“ It has a cool look, but I am not sure I like it. ” -muskie027


Monday, March 1, 2021

Set: 2017 Bowman Platinum - Purple (Rate)

Card: #76 Cody Bellinger


“ that's a pretty RC card of the 2019 ML MVP ” -abide
  2
“ Bowman Platinum always just looks ugly to me. I don't understand the appeal. It's a low-rent set that is trying way too heard to be upper tier. Hard pass. ” -ketchupman36
  2
“ Card doesn’t look too bad. Nice rookie card of a star. ” -mkb
  1
“ A pretty nice card here! Sure it's not exactly cheap, either. ” -IfbBirdsCards

“ Oh dang it is a parallel, I was beginning to think that maybe Bowman Platinum was getting away from the boring silver foil/chrome looks. ” -captkirk42

“ I have been a fan of the various Platinum sets released through the years and I dig this one too. ” -Corky
  1
“ Ooh, Bellinger Rookie Card. I like the card art and value is probably great. ” -NickyCollects

“ Love me some Bowman Platinum! Clean and classy in my humble opinion. ” -Madden95


Sunday, February 28, 2021

Set: 2008 Topps Chrome - Xfractors (Rate)

Card: #TC67 Joey Galloway


“ Scan make it rough, but I'll bet it is pretty cool in hand. ” -muskie027
  1
“ I like the design of this card. ” -Brendan Barrick

“ Probably “Not Quite” but a Bucs card opening for comments a few weeks after their Super Bowl win 🤔🤣😉 ” -stevejrogers

“ Like the 2008 Topps Design. Won't comment about not liking Chrome. Black background I forget is that just for the X-Fractors? ” -captkirk42

“ BUCKEYE!! Joey was a helluva player for years. Just shy of HOF worthy, but in my opinion, not by a whole lot. And since his playing days he's joined a huge list of former OSU players to move to the broadcast studio, and in my opinion has done well for himself there as well. Joey is my third highest total in my Buckeye PC, behind only Cris Carter and Eddie George. ” -Brimose

“ Can't stand 2008 Topps. ” -DarkSide830


Saturday, February 27, 2021

Set: 2012 Bowman Chrome - Prospects (Rate)

Card: #BCP134 Daniel Santana


“ Maybe it's just me but I don't think the team logo should be smaller than the Bowman Chrome logo ” -pugchump
  3
“ Either Daniel was planning to bunt and said "NO" or the photographer caught him just as he was starting to show a bunt. Either way, I like the photo and the design. Bowman tends to have nice designs overall, but Topps destroys that with multiple versions of EVERYTHING! I'd bet that there are 4-6 versions of this card before you even get into the parallels of this card. I still like the general design of this specific card though. ” -spazmatastic
  4
“ This design is almost too basic. I dont like all the wasted space on the border. ” -parsley24

“ Solid! As a collector from the 1900's I've always had a thing for these shiny cards. ” -Madden95

“ I think I've mentioned my love/hate with Bowman sets many times. I like the designs for the most part. I recall in 2012 I got plenty of these cards and probably have a Nationals team set maybe, maybe not. I really hate the Prospect aspect of the set particularly the numbering system that Topps uses for Bowan flagship and Chrome. First they use BC# for the very base chrome cards which are the regular guys and vets, then they use P =Prospect well really BCP# Bowman Chrome Prospect, then there is I think BCPD which is Prospect-Draft or is it BCDP? see I'm confused already. Then when I look on the checklists to see if my card for some guy who was only drafted by the team with a minor league contract and never made it to the Big team is in the set that is called "Bowman Chrome Drafts and Prospects" or just "Bowman Prospects". I never know which "set" to look under. ” -captkirk42

“ yeet ” -Buckeye Fan

“ That's a good scan for a chrome card. I used to love them before I began scanning my entire collection. Not so much anymore. ” -Billy Kingsley

“ I never got into Chrome, but liked the few i pulled as inserts. They have a fun cool look to them. ” -muskie027


Friday, February 26, 2021

Set: 2007 Ganz Webkinz Series 2 (Rate)

Card: #B2-02 Dex Dangerous, To The Rescue!


“ the statistics on the back are disappointing ” -abide
  9
“ ? ” -muskie027
  1
“ FRICKING WEBKINZ LOL Doesn’t look like that bad of a design tho ” -mkb
  2
“ "Screen legend". weird ” -cjjt

“ 0 people have this card on their wantlist. Shocker. ” -parsley24
  3
“ Probably one of the few non-sports sets I haven't heard of, but it must have been popular, seeing as this is Series 2! ” -bkklaos

“ A lion flying around, looking to taser a teddy bear, who is suffering with a bad case of pink eye. GRRRREAT! ” -CollectingAfterDeath
  4
“ Nice kids non sport card. A TCG? CCG? ” -captkirk42

“ Hate these non-sports cards . . . but those who like them, enjoy . . . ” -georgecf
  1
“ Webkinz seem to be a bit more deadly than I remember. ” -rmpaq5
  3
“ Webkinz! My kids used to be into those. ” -trauty


Thursday, February 25, 2021

Set: 1994 Fleer Shell FACT (Rate)

Card: #41 Ken Ruettgers


“ Overall I like this design, but for someone who doesn't really know football, the names can be somewhat hard to read. The printed version below can blend into the background pretty easily, even the foil version on the base cards. ” -Billy Kingsley
  3
“ Three different photos on one card is a nice touch, but I can't read the name at the bottom because it doesn't contrast well with the white and yellow on the uniforms. ” -pugchump

“ Another Fact: Ken went to USC, not Rutgers. ” -buckstorecards
  6
“ Absolutely love the photos used for this card. So much action and the old school feel of a sideline profile. ” -Madden95

“ Never heard of these, but I like it! ” -bkklaos

“ Graphically, a beautiful card . . . The use of pictures is outstanding, and it is very pleasant to look at . . . I can do without the signature on both sides, and make the nameplate easier to read, as well as adding the position . . . But those, despite seeming major, do not detract from the beauty of the card . . . ” -georgecf

“ The 1994 Fleer regular was a nice product. This particular set is ok. ” -Brendan Barrick

“ Nice Fleer card. Ah I miss Fleer. The thing I don't like about 94 Fleer is the faux auto in foil lettering at least they "printed" the name as well. ” -captkirk42

“ Great combo of trivia and a good trading card. Love the 2 different photos on the back as well. Wish we had more like this in modern trading cards. ” -OverkillKid

“ i liked this design, also wish promos like this were still a thing ” -Thunderfoot


Wednesday, February 24, 2021

Set: 2005 Topps (Rate)

Card: #79 Brad Wilkerson


“ Good thing that dirt stain wasn't a few inches the other direction... ” -Billy Kingsley
  9
“ I like this Topps set. It's also a good chrome set. ” -abide
  2
“ I really liked the design this year. The foil was well done and complimented nicely. ” -BrewerAndy
  1
“ I really like this design overall for the card. It is a nice clean design. the only think is I would like the position on the front of the card. ” -kirkscards

“ This exists? I can't say I've ever seen a 2005 Topps Baseball card. Then again, I opened my first pack in 2016. The style reminds me of a low quality Minor League set. Not a fan. ” -NickyCollects
  1
“ Not a big fan of the 2000's Topps designs, but the early ones are better then '07 and '08 at least. ” -DarkSide830

“ Nice Expos/Nationals card. One of my fave Expos to Nationals at the time of their move. During that inaugural Washington Nationals Season Brad was the Nationals spokesperson for Capital One bank or Oops might have been PNC bank. Hmm the more I think it might have been PNC bank. There was a cool commercial where he turns the "M" on his hat upside down to make the "W" and he has a briefcase for his bat. Sadly it has been ages since I've seen that commercial and have never found it online. Ah seems none of the banks involved nor the Nationals were pleased with the gimmick (https://www.karenfeld.com/cap-lost-dueling-pitches/) ” -captkirk42

“ This was the last year the Expos had cards printed before they moved to Washington. Also I like this design a lot, I like the reflective letters at the top. ” -pugchump

“ The name and team logo look good, but the team name and player name are difficult to read . . . The back is nicer than the usual Topps effort . . . Except for the vertical writing, a nice card . . . But the vertical writing ruins it . . . ” -georgecf

“ I like this design! ” -cjjt


Tuesday, February 23, 2021

Set: 2017 Panini Contenders Draft Picks - Blue Foil (Rate)

Card: #170 Gerald Everett


“ Wow, that's a lot of effort on that signature. I know they are asked to sign a lot of stuff, but it must have been a disappointing pull for whoever was the first to Gett this. ” -Billy Kingsley
  14
“ I think he missed a few letters in his last name lol ” -pugchump
  1
“ I love Draft Tickets across all sports! The way they put the seat as their....uhhh...is that supposed to be jersey number? Age? Birthday? I don't know but I do know that the row represents his height and the section represents his weight. Great card. ” -NickyCollects
  2
“ NICE auto card even if it is a stickergraph and a college card. OMG this guy is on the Rams. Nice to know he got somewhere. That is my biggest beef with these "draft" college cards they produce them before the draft so you don't know if the guys made the pros or not. It is assumed since they are in the set they made it but that isn't always the case. ” -captkirk42

“ A bit weak on the (sticker) autograph, but I still like it! I know, they could have used a different picture on the back (and I do agree), but still would be collectable for me! ” -bkklaos

“ I like the color of the card. ” -Brendan Barrick

“ Enjoy this card. Sincerely yours, X ” -volbox

“ Basic Signature. Basic Design. Blue foil has always been one of my favorites. Great card overall. A- ” -OverkillKid

“ Really never have been a fan of the Ticket design. Especially detest same front/back photo; laziness. ” -SFC Temple


Monday, February 22, 2021

Set: 2019-20 Hoops (Rate)

Card: #123 Kevin Knox II


“ About what I would expect from Hoops. Man, a touch of color anywhere on the back could go such a long way to offset the panini "copy and paste" feel. ” -Madden95
  2
“ This is a solid set. Nice layout and photographs. It was always nice to count on Hoops for a relatively inexpensive set. No more. The prices for the 2020-21 cards are beyond ridiculous. Unless something changes, the "NBA" in NBA Hoops stands for "Never Buy Again." ” -Big Ray
  11
“ Still using Windows 3.1 for the card backs. ” -volbox
  3
“ Happy to see a Knicks card. Wish they did better. ” -Billy Kingsley

“ Should be a "Jr" and not a "II" given that his dad is Kevin Knox Sr ” -pugchump

“ OK looking card. Sad thing though since Panini has soo many basketball sets and brands this looks like a Panini Donruss card at first glance. Sometimes I wish the card companies would go back to the old days of just 1 set per sport per year. Not 2 or 3 dozen sets per year, with thousands upon thousands of inserts and parallels and short printed cards. ” -captkirk42
  1
“ The photo on the front is nice . . . A GOOD action shot is hard to beat . . . The back looks generic and seems in stark contrast to the front . . . ” -georgecf

“ Would have liked to have been able to collect and open these, but the cost of anything the last 2 years is making collecting very prohibitive. ” -muskie027

“ i now keep these cards where it shows the front row because you never know if a murderer may be sitting in the front row of the picture. ” -parsley24
  3


Sunday, February 21, 2021

Set: 2008 Donruss Threads - Retail Green (Rate)

Card: #199 Justin Harper


“ Green foil is cool. We need more green foil lettering. Also, LOL @ the SN being off center. ” -Billy Kingsley
  1
“ This is pretty boring, I wonder why this is an SN. ” -pugchump
  1
“ The layout of the border almost completely hides the fact he's sporting those practice threads. Very clean back to boot. Very nice! ” -Madden95

“ At the time I really liked 2008 Donruss Threads but soon tired of the plain white design. ” -captkirk42

“ not a bad looking card. Like a low budget flawless. ” -parsley24

“ I like this card. ” -Brendan Barrick

Page:

  

Copyright © 2024 Trading Card Database LLC
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.