General Forum

I would beg this of anyone. You don't have to make changes yourself to help the site - if you see something, say something. See something wrong in a set you're working on, and don't have time to fix it? No problem. Submit an IR and someone will. That helps make the site better too.

There is nothing more annoying than when it is painfully obvious someone only makes changes to benefit themselves. For example, someone only adds the team they collect to a set, rather than even making an attempt to add the other 29 or 31 as well.

Please, please, please. Feel free to draw attention to sets with problems. I know I feel like a nuisance sometimes when I submit a tiny little inaccuracy - but I do know that deep down, it is making this site the best it can be, and that can't be done without all the watching eyes submitting what they find wrong. 

Jason, before i bail.....The set says 801, I'm guessing the 800s are considered 2 different cards, thus the 801 set total. For the most part, the ERR/VAR/CORs look ok, I mean I could IR the addition of some but I'm better off letting that rest for now. My 1 problem is Jeff George, not sure why the Illinois card is considered a base set VAR. It should belong in the Draft Card Set leaving the base set #669 the Jeff George card. So Jason do I IR this? I'm sure somebody will reply "What are you talking about?" LMK

Bob, yes an IR will be needed. The IR should say, please delete this card from the checklist. The card is already listed in the Draft Day insert set. Please transfer collection info to this location: https://www.tradingcarddb.com/ViewCard.cfm/sid/90435/cid/6409630/1990-Pro-Set---Draft-Day-669b-Jeff-George?PageIndex=1

TY. The 1989 and 1991 ProSet FB also needs some work as well. Later, for me ! ~Bob~

I’ll check later as I’m off to work but I think the George is included as it could be found in packs

Many sites reference the George draft as inserted into packs such as Beckett, hope this link works https://www.beckett.com/news/pro-set-put-draft-day-what-ifs-on-cardboard/

as it is pack inserted I would consider it part of the set, others may not but it is up to them

.....so be it. aussiewayne is the ProSet Master, I trust his judgement. 

Now let's proceed to cleaning up 1989 then 1991.

So...I was out of town for a couple of days and came back to this thread.  Along with Bob, I am a huge variation collector and like to have my master sets complete with all errors and variations.  I know some don't, but to each his own.  Anyway, I was going through my sets and looking at the numbers and wanted to report when I saw issues.  I have no idea how to resolve these issues or if I have the correct level do to so.  If I should enter an IA for each of these, please just let me know and I will do so:

• 1981 Fleer shows 661/660 in the basic set
• 1999 Topps shows 529/462 in the basic set
• 2002 Topps shows 790/718 in the basic set
• 2004 Topps Traded shows 221/220 in the basic set
• 2006 Topps shows 665/659 in the basic set
• 2007 Topps shows 674/661 in the basic set
• 2007 Topps Update shows 332/330 in the basic set
• 2008 Topps shows 662/660 in the basic set
• 2008 Topps Update shows 333/330 in the basic set
• 2009 Topps Update shows 352/330 in the basic set
• 2010 Topps shows 662/660 in the basic set
• 2010 Topps Update shows 354/330
• 2011 Topps Update shows 355/330
• 2012 Topps Shows 663/661
• 2012 Topps Update shows 360/330
• 2013 Topps Update shows 372/330
• 2014 Topps shows 661/660
• 2014 Topps Update shows 329/330 (I've double and triple checked...I have all cards missing and my master shows 100%!)
• 2015 Topps shows 755/700
• 2015 Topps Update shows 523/400
• 2016 Topps shows 704/700
• 2016 Topps Update shows 346/300 (is probably 350/300 but I'm missing 4 cards from the master)
• 2017 Topps shows 726/700

In each case (except 2007 Topps and 2016 Topps Update...please help me find the ones I'm missing!), I have 100% of the master set already, so those numbers seemed reasonable.

Sorry for the long post.

I think this goes along with OCHawkeye's list of sets that don't have the a/b/c thing going correctly. Entering IRs will only clog up the system as in probably most cases, it's more than just a single total number issue.

The Master Set totalling thig was just instituted, have a little patience with Admin while the kinks get worked out. And it doesn't appear to be kinks with the way the master sets are being reported, it's in the way the checklists were prepared.

Not a problem.  I think this is a nice change.  Just thought somebody would want to know that the issue exists if they are working on fixing them.  The one that has me most troubled is the 2014 Topps Update showing less than the total, which is just weird to me.