General Forum

You need the anchor "<a> </a>" and "href" tags like you used in your signature links.

Bob,

Thanks for posting this. I took a quick look and in the 1989 Topps #605 3 card variations are shown (I only knew of 2) but in the image one card looks a bit Iffie (Dan will get this reference), But honestly 2 cards (The 2 I know exist) have a washed out black  coloration but the third (one I have never heard of) is much darker black. 

I know many of the printing differences are not for listing here,  and I do not collect them, but....it is interesting to read in such a place like a blog with pictures of the differences...

mark

I found the link in Bob's profile (thanks C2Cigars!). I love reading about errors and variations. I'd heard of the work by Gildeson and Vrechek but was unaware of Cady's work. I've added that link to my Stadium Fantasium blogroll. Thanks Bob for the heads up!

bbcardz, NP, Mike and I go back many years as both of us traded, sold and bought errors. We stocked up and added to our colletion. A lot of my ERR/VAR/COR inventory [dupes], were pulled and sorted based on the book by Gilkeson. Mike and I also built up the variations found in Fleer Stickers using Gilkeson's book. As Mike and I reconnected, he wanted to know if I had anything to add to the blog. I do, but have so much going on at the moment. In due time I will suddenly appear. lol. ~BOB~ 

FYI: I have many of my surplus ERR/VAR/COR cards and Fleer Stickers available for trade. 

100% in agreement with Finestkind . Is it really an "error" card if it's done on purpose. Also should it not be an UER since there will be no attempt to correct it? About as fake as the WWF (oops WWE <- error comment).

Thanks Buccaneers.  Those kinds of errors should remain UER. I don't collect error cards.There's nothing wrong with collcting error cards. It's another cool part of the hobby.

Send me the link please

Thanks, Bob. I am to interested and found the link on your profile.