Posted By | Message |
Billy Kingsley
Posts: 7,512
Joined: Aug 2011
|
Tuesday, October 23, 2018 1:59 PM | |
I really should not have to say this or explain it, but the most recent gallery had a card selected where half the card is cropped off selected as the sample image. Now it makes more work to put a decent scan in it's place, and really, why would anyone think that was acceptable in the first place?
Steps have already been taken to remove it.
But please stop making it harder for those of us who care enough to do it right and bothering Admin to remove an image that should never have been posted, let alone made the sample image.
-------------------------------
VERY slow trading due to health problems. Not transferrable so safe to trade with, just moving is painful and can't always access the cards. Cardboard History My COMC New Collection Website: Cardboard History Gallery (Still under construction) Tips on how to make your scans look like the card does in hand (No more washed out, fuzzy scans!):
|
|
|
|
vrooomed
Posts: 14,945
Joined: Dec 2012
|
Tuesday, October 23, 2018 2:57 PM | |
And to piggy back on this post about adding scans - if you notice that a card (or set) seems to be listed twice, instead of uploading the same scans to both locations, question why you might be using the same exact scans for the same card in two locations.
We try very hard here to keep a record of each card - once. Please think about that when you're uploading images.
There should never be an instance where you would be able to use the same images more than once.
-------------------------------
-- Dan -- Note: Please see my profile for more info regarding trading (section updated 3/4/2024). I have added a large portion of my inventory to the site, and currently have trading turned on (details are in my profile).
|
|
|
|
captkirk42
Posts: 2,268
Joined: May 2011
|
Tuesday, October 23, 2018 3:01 PM | |
That reminds me I need to locate my unripped A&G Rip card. A week or so ago I while trying to rememer which one I had (I had to check some of my mail-day posts on some forums) I noticed the back for that card here in the database has 90% paper loss so you can't tell what is on the back at all. Since mine is unripped it shows the full back. I'm not sure when I'll do that project SIGH.
-------------------------------
I collect: Baseball, Football, Hockey, Mostly Vintage pre1980, My Homie teams - Washington/Baltimore Teams Senators (Twins, Rangers), Expos/Nationals, Redskins, Capitals, Bullets/Wizards - HOFers - Non-sport (mostly TV shows and movies). My Trade List is very much a work in progress CaptKirk42s Trading Card Blog Curly W Cards Strive For '65 YouTube klandersen42
|
|
|
|
bzjr68
Posts: 113
Joined: Jan 2018
|
Tuesday, October 23, 2018 5:29 PM | |
I think I found a duplicate listed, 1982 Topps baseball has the "team leaders/checklist" cards listed in the set. There is also a seperate listing under inserts and related sets as a mail in set. Could someone verify this?
https://www.tradingcarddb.com/ViewSet.cfm/sid/89/1982-Topps
vrooomed wrote:
And to piggy back on this post about adding scans - if you notice that a card (or set) seems to be listed twice, instead of uploading the same scans to both locations, question why you might be using the same exact scans for the same card in two locations.
We try very hard here to keep a record of each card - once. Please think about that when you're uploading images.
There should never be an instance where you would be able to use the same images more than once.
Edited on: Oct 23, 2018 - 5:32PM -------------------------------
Life has a 100% mortality rate, it's killing us all.
|
|
|
|
switzr1
Posts: 6,332
Joined: Dec 2013
|
Tuesday, October 23, 2018 5:47 PM | |
Those came in a mail-in offer as an uncut sheet. I don't know if they are any different from the standard (an extra asterisk of something minor) but if not I don't think they belong here, considering pretty much all cards originate from an uncut sheet.
Edit: upon further review, these might be perforated, and therefore absolutely belong here.
Edited on: Oct 23, 2018 - 5:54PM -------------------------------
I'm going to reevaluate how I collect after the new year. It's just getting way too expensive for the new stuff. Sometimes I just want to buy a pack, not a whole box or even blaster.
|
|
|
|
Sportzcommish
Posts: 6,013
Joined: Oct 2016
|
Tuesday, October 23, 2018 5:56 PM | |
Then if they're perforated we may have another problem with uploading incorrect images as those on the mail-in set don't look perforated to me.
-------------------------------
Follow my blog - I Identify as a Card Collector. “Aslan didn't tell Pole what would happen. He only told her what to do. That fellow will be the death of us once he's up, I shouldn't wonder. But that doesn't let us off following the signs.” - Puddleglum in The Silver Chair by C. S. Lewis
|
|
|
|
jimetal7212
Posts: 4,844
Joined: Dec 2016
|
Tuesday, October 23, 2018 6:02 PM | |
Edited on: Oct 23, 2018 - 6:10PM -------------------------------
My sins have come to face me, I can feel it That I have lived my life in vain And now I know I'll reap the seeds I've sown
|
|
|
|
bzjr68
Posts: 113
Joined: Jan 2018
|
Tuesday, October 23, 2018 6:42 PM | |
-------------------------------
Life has a 100% mortality rate, it's killing us all.
|
|
|
|
C2Cigars
Posts: 11,462
Joined: Oct 2014
|
Tuesday, October 23, 2018 7:25 PM | |
I'm not sure where you're getting that they were perforated. The sheets were of a thinner (different) cardstock because the sheet was folded for mailing.
-------------------------------
Someday my cards may double in value and then be worth half of what I paid for them.
|
|
|
|
switzr1
Posts: 6,332
Joined: Dec 2013
|
Tuesday, October 23, 2018 8:04 PM | |
Chuck, the baseballcardpedia link says it. Maybe it's wrong, but that's where I had read it too.
-------------------------------
I'm going to reevaluate how I collect after the new year. It's just getting way too expensive for the new stuff. Sometimes I just want to buy a pack, not a whole box or even blaster.
|
|
|
|