Site Forum

Would it be possible to add "Brand" as a field when creating a new set, so we don't have to go back and remember to edit the set name off the Brand before submitting the checklist?

In the "Your Collection" section under "Sets in your collection that are almost complete", is it possible to add a toggle where you could mark a set as complete?

With so many recent sets coming with SP's it could be useful.

That would come in handy for TEAM collectors  or like myself a set collectors that not chasing every VAR or SP of a set.  

This has probably already been discussed, but I would love to see a way to "lock" a card so that it doesn't automatically get picked up by a new PID creation.
I was working on a comic book card set and created a PID for a character named "Fireball." And then I had to clear out the PID link for 50 something Magic The Gathering cards that are titled "Fireball." The MtG cards aren't characters/people/unique items and thus don't get a PID.
The only way around it that I know of at the moment is to put quotes around any card name that shouldn't get a PID just so it won't get inadvertently linked to something else.
Would love to see like a radio button that you could select somewhere on a card entry that would essentially remove it from consideration for PID linking. 

jlamberth - there is. If a card should never ever get a PID, assign it 0 (zero). This will keep it from getting autolinked to new (or old) PIDs. (Cards will auto-link when the "Verify Names" button is clicked, and if you've removed the faulty PID, then clicked it again, it auto-links again - I found this out the hard way - several times - and had to discuss with Admin - and then the zero PID was invented.)

Ah, good to know! That will make working on non-sport much easier! Thanks!

I agree with both of you. Something to indicate no more cards needed would be very helpful.

Thank you, to Admin, for adding the Brand field to the "Add Set" page!

Formally requesting something like this mentioned awhile back in another thread...

While on the topic, is there any way we might be able to get the Insert Sets page tweaked.  Maybe by having all of the various insert parallels rolled up under their insert base?

This set has 129 insert sets (which more to come probably).  I think it would make that page so much easier to digest if it were presented  in a way that could group the insert sets.

I completely second that idea. An expandable/collapsible insert parallel listing sounds great to me. It would make it much faster to look through the insert lists without the dozens of parallels listed there too.