1991 Donruss Baseball Forum

The BC insert set now has the appropriate cards listed here: https://www.tradingcarddb.com/Checklist.cfm/sid/97006

They are awaiting a re-sort to get them in proper order, but all the Note/Note2 fields are accurate.

The Hawkins card is a strange one. It appears that the error front (position instead of the highlight) only has a "INC" version while the correct front has both "INC" and "INC." versions. the ERR is [a], no dot COR is [b], and dot COR is [c].

The rest of the set is no dot [a] and dot [b].

Images have not yet been re-positioned, so there may be dot backs in the [a] slots. Feel free to request them to be moved or to replace the scans already here. (Another great opportunity to put in place the zoomable scans!) And this holds true with the base set as well. Plenty of opportunities for points there. :)

Just to clarify, are you saying that, for this set, it's cool to replace any non-zoomable scan with a new one (of the correct card, of course. I'll have incorrect ones moved through IR)? Does this go for any card on the site?

Thanks,

Josh

I'll wait, probably better to allow any updates to run.

Hi Josh,

If you have the ability to replace images, yes. You will not receive site points for replacing a scan that is currently in the correct spot and meet all requirements. But, by doing that, we will have a much more user-friendly site where clear scans are available.

Thanks!

Thanks to everybody involved in getting this set listed correctly. 

All Bonus Cards variations are listed as the "b" versions (even all three Hawkins). Is this intentional? I changed some of the "INC" versions to "a" but halfway through I thought there might be a reason so I changed them back and came here. 

Thanks,

Josh

Looks like you changed them when I look at the change log. Why did you do that?

I fixed it and then locked down the set so no one can mess it up again.

Dan,

Gotta plead innocence here. Wasn't me that messed 'em up to begin with. When I saw it today, every card had a "b" designation. I corrected 1-15, then thought, hey, maybe there is some reason these are all labeled "b". I saw from the Change Log you had changed the card numbers on 3/25, so I reversed my changes, and posted the question. Not sure how they got that way, but you can see from the changelog i didn't touch 16-22, which I see now that you've fixed as well.

Thanks,

Josh

I have no clue then. They were right when I got the additional cards added. Then sometime after that, they got messed up without any notation happening in the log.

A case where locking the set will keep this from happening again.