2019 Topps Update Baseball Forum

I think that there is a error with the 2019 Topps Update.  It is missing all the SP and SSP's.

Trade On!

You've got to be kidding me...

How many times must we go over the same issues with uploaded checklists? I have many more words concerning this subject but they aren't appropriate for a public forum. 

Collection info is already present. So a L8 will have to insert each VAR and SP and SSP one-by-one. 

That is what I thought.  

It's time for Admin to start taking away checklist posting capabilities. 

Thankfully, all it takes is a checklist of the additions to be appended by an L8, and then Admin can run a procedure which will re-sort and pull the letters out of the numbers (1b -> 1[b]). If someone puts together the checklist but isn't L8, contact me and I can load it and contact Admin.

those make or break points strike again.....

If we can start a petition somehow, I'm on board with this idea. 

Folks: deep breath and relax. :)

I reached out to the member who did this and it was actually a matter of confusion, not ill will or point farming. I'm working with him to get the other cards listed. I'm hopeful (with good reason) that he'll provide the checklist to me and we'll get it uploaded fairly soon.

Again, it was a misunderstanding of the system, he's learned and apologized, and hopefully is working on getting the rest of the checklist toegther for me to upload soon.

I actually went to see who it was and noticed it was a newer member and not a "usual suspect", if you will. I hoped that was the case and am happy to hear that I was correct. 

That said, if permissions were to be revoked, I'm certainly not cruel enough to ask for a "one-and-done" standard. Rather, multiple serious offenses result in reduced or rescinded permissions. That way, members would receive some sort of warning on the first offense and those who want to would learn from their mistakes. Those who choose to ignore it would eventually suffer the consequences. Perhaps there could even be a system for "redemption", where a member who works with a L8 member to correct mistakes can be vouched for and have the "warning" removed.

I'm spitballing and basically running with Billy's thoughts, but I would fully support this. Would this situation here have been avoided? No. But could it potentially cut down on these issues in the future? I personally think so.

Well said Jason. I expected it to be from the usual suspect, as you allude to. I didn't actually look. I feel that someone who abuses the system, and openly admits to such, should lose their ability to do the things they do wrong on a regular basis. But an honest mistake, as it sounds like from Dan's post, should not be cause for ability loss.