2020 Gummy Arts (Unlicensed) Baseball Forum

...should this set be listed? As best I can tell, these are just home-made, handdrawn cards, no different than if I sat down and took a bunch of thick "dummy" cards from packs and drew pictures and sold them. They're neat, but I personally don't see how they should be here.

We also have a couple of 2019 sets listed. Thoughts?

My vote would be ABSOLUTELY NOT! Nothing by that name (Gummy Arts) should be listed on this site.

...And all I could think of at first was ... GUMMY BEARS !...  Yum  ... You know..

The 5 pound guy....!!

Not something I'd personally chase but if they are sold in packs why not?  Upper Deck put out some draw your own cards and we list them. We also have plenty of unlicensed cards on here also. Apparently someone here wants to collect or list them and the rest of us can just ignore them as long as they meet admins criteria for listing.

Such tolerance, randylaw! The card police aren't going to like your view (which I agree with - I think homemade was actually even a category when I first joined). We need to get you some Topps underwear that are a size too small to bring your venom out!

I have nothing to add other than to point out these cards are frickin awesome whether they're listable or not 

Definitely should NOT be listed in Baseball.

If these are mass produced (be it homemade or not), there is a checklist for them, and they are cards.

Technically, they pass the test for inclusion (if they are not simply 1/1s).

ooouuuuu, Nice topic. As most know, I believe all cards that pass the test should be entered. I agree there is 1] precedence from 2019 listed sets, 2] precedence from similar sets [isn't an Inquirer set like this].

But where do they get listed Non-Sports? Multi-sports? Where do we list sets that have All Sports and Non Sports categories?

My guess, this one is in the hands of the BIG GUY and his team. lol.

Bob, please remember that precedence is out the window. I really don't give a toss what's already on here. We know that there is stuff on here that doesn't blong (there are still IRs in the queue awaiting Admin's aprroval or axe).

What matters to me is - right now - according to the site's set inclusion guidelines - does this set meet the criteria?

And that is IT. I don't care if there are 100 other sets EXACTLY like it in the database, what matters to me is all about THIS set (whatever "this set" is at the moment). So please, I'll ask you again, ignore what you call precedence, because frankly it don't mean crap.