| Posted By | Message |
|
HowlingFury
Posts: 137
Joined: Nov 2013
|
| Tuesday, August 26, 2014 5:12 PM | |
Can't find any info
on these, but I
admit I haven't
looked too hard.
I've got a full
size Desmond
Jennings with no
number. Not serial
numbered or
anything, but
neither are the
mini no#s even
though they're
supposedly SN50.
Anyone have info on
them?
-------------------------------
Oh, there's a clock
in my head and
despite what it
said, another one
on the wall. They
don't agree at
all...
|
|
|
|
|
captkirk42
Posts: 2,267
Joined: May 2011
|
| Wednesday, August 27, 2014 7:31 AM | |
-------------------------------
I collect: Baseball, Football, Hockey, Mostly Vintage pre1980, My Homie teams - Washington/Baltimore Teams Senators (Twins, Rangers), Expos/Nationals, Redskins, Capitals, Bullets/Wizards - HOFers - Non-sport (mostly TV shows and movies). My Trade List is very much a work in progress CaptKirk42s Trading Card Blog Curly W Cards Strive For '65 YouTube klandersen42 |
|
|
|
|
HowlingFury
Posts: 137
Joined: Nov 2013
|
| Thursday, August 28, 2014 10:21 AM | |
You get lost in
thought? lol.
I don't know, but
this might be an
actual error.
There's no space
for a number
between the scroll
bracket design on
the mini no#s, but
there's a space for
a number on this.
Too lazy to do any
real research. captkirk42 wrote: That is strange.
I
|
-------------------------------
Oh, there's a clock
in my head and
despite what it
said, another one
on the wall. They
don't agree at
all...
|
|
|
|
|
jackal726
Posts: 134
Joined: Mar 2013
|
| Thursday, August 28, 2014 2:34 PM | |
I have yet to see that card with a number. I think it's an uncorrected error, but not at all rare. |
|
|
|
|
HowlingFury
Posts: 137
Joined: Nov 2013
|
| Thursday, August 28, 2014 3:33 PM | |
UER seems like the
answer. I hadn't
realized I needed
114 for my set and
it was Jennings.
Case closed. jackal726 wrote: I have yet to see that card with a number. I think it's an uncorrected error, but not at all rare.
|
-------------------------------
Oh, there's a clock
in my head and
despite what it
said, another one
on the wall. They
don't agree at
all...
|
|
|
|
|
wjsenke
Posts: 165
Joined: Jun 2015
|
| Friday, October 16, 2015 5:36 PM | |
Could someone change the mini no number checklist to change to NNO instead of a card number since that is the whole point of the set?
Also, the note says SN50 and really it should be a print run of 50, not serialized, but announced from Topps. Is this a PR50 then? or do we not have an official abbreviation for it?
thanks
-------------------------------
Baseball: 1957 + 61 Topps, 1950 + 53 Bowman (Color), If i win the lottery maybe i will try to finish an 1887 Buchner Gold Coin and the 1914 and 1915 Cracker Jack Sets too |
|
|
|
|
C2Cigars
Posts: 11,437
Joined: Oct 2014
|
| Friday, October 16, 2015 6:07 PM | |
The database doesn't annotate actual Print Runs (just a short print "SP").
-------------------------------
Someday my cards may double in value and then be worth half of what I paid for them. |
|
|
|
|
ranfordfan
Posts: 4,975
Joined: Jun 2014
|
| Friday, October 16, 2015 8:04 PM | |
Yup, I asked a while back about adding a PR to the glossary but got shut down pretty quickly (but nicely). Alot of hockey sets have black, silver or gold versions and the PR would be 100 20 and 1 but are not SN in any way and I felt it should still be stated that each has a set PR but I did not get anywhere. It was frustrating because when collectin one of every card of a player, I need to know what the odds of getting that card will be, SN or not. But I pick my battles!! LOL I just be sure to have yet another list other than here that includes that information. It all about lists now isnt it .... one cant have enough lists. =)
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
