Random Card of the Day

“ This is absolutely no reason this card couldn't have gotten a real number. I loathe the letters for the numbers fad. I am still hoping, after almost 20 years, that's it's still going to turn out to be a fad. In the grand scheme of things, 20 years in a hobby with an at least 139 year history is just a drop in the bucket. The card itself is just fine. ” -Billy Kingsley

“ It looks like they forgot to print the left. Something is missing. This could have been better. ” -muskie027

“ Boom, boom, boom! It's bad when I see a card and a list of negatives quickly pop in my head. Three things I'm rarely a fan of: 1) horizontal layout; 2) designs that limit the photo; and 3) memorabilia attached to a card. ” -Sportzcommish

“ Does card have less valve because it was a pro bowl jersey? ” -kirkscards

“ Just added this one a couple of weeks ago and yes John Randle played for the Seahawks. ” -carthage44

“ The boxes! Oh god, the boxes! ” -marcbrubaker

“ Interesting design for an insert serial numbered card (although #/1499 a bit high for serial numbering in my book). Oh just noticed by looking at the back that it was a GU card. Hard to tell from the scan as the swatch is all white (slightly off-white). Also interesting that their jerseys for the Pro Bowl shown said "All-Star" usually the NFL Pro Bowl things and cards call them "ALL PRO" instead of All Star. Weird. ” -captkirk42

“ Not too bad, even though there's so much wasted space. ” -Doc Floyd

“ great scan, too much of a good thing happening on the card itself ” -hphillips