Tuesday, December 18, 2018
Year: 1993
Set: Topps Micro (Rate)
Card: #248 Scott Scudder
“ Micro is apt. I like them just because they are so unique. ” -Billy Kingsley
“ The design is boring like I feel about most Topps releases. They tend towards simple, boring designs. Now onto the scourge that is tiny cards. If card collectors wanted things this tiny we would be stamp collectors not card collectors. We have an industry standard size, can we keep it that size so everything can be stored easily? ” -davidhandberry
“ Not a bad design. Though the printing on the larger size cards was blurry at times. I cannot imagine what it looked on the micro cards. ” -kirkscards
“ Awwwww, how cute! It's a baby baseball card! ” -suomibear8
“ These Micro sets win! What do they win? Hardest set to sort. Really don't know what the draw was to these. I guess they're good for little kids and their tiny fingers. ” -vrooomed
“ ACK! A Micro card. These were OK for a Cracker Jack prize but for a regular 770 card set (or however many cards were in the full set) it is microscope overkill. ” -captkirk42
“ Micro cards are ehh. ” -Kirbythedodger
“ I've never really understood the need for micro cards, unless it's pretending that it's a normal size card in my hand and my muscles are huge. ” -vanstryland
“ 1993 topps has always been one of my favorite sets(football anyway), never seen the micro before ” -Thunderfoot
“ No me gusta micro sets. ” -muskie027