| Posted By | Message |
|
Doc Floyd
Posts: 483
Joined: Sep 2014
|
| Thursday, July 28, 2016 7:07 AM | |
Let's just ignore those and hope they go away! Just kidding.
Looks like they are right to me, even though some are just speculative as to what team would have taken them, but didn't. An additional tag of the college team along with the NBA team wouldn't be out of place either.
-------------------------------
"I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing Astroturf and the designated hitter." - Crash Davis |
|
|
|
|
C2Cigars
Posts: 11,467
Joined: Oct 2014
|
| Thursday, July 28, 2016 7:18 AM | |
The same thing was done with football. I can't remember the set, but now I won't rest until I find it again.
-------------------------------
Someday my cards may double in value and then be worth half of what I paid for them. |
|
|
|
|
UKboogie
Posts: 766
Joined: Sep 2015
|
| Thursday, July 28, 2016 3:15 PM | |
"Let's just ignore those and hope they go away!"
Amen!
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
UKboogie
Posts: 766
Joined: Sep 2015
|
|
|
|
|
ranfordfan
Posts: 4,975
Joined: Jun 2014
|
| Tuesday, September 6, 2016 8:41 PM | |
Admin says to go with the team that is listed on the card, but I too have found glitches that don't work in the hockey sets, especially ....... yup you guessed it ......... ITG !!!
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
ketchupman36
Posts: 787
Joined: Feb 2016
|
| Wednesday, September 7, 2016 1:09 PM | |
According to what I've gathered from this thread, the team name is based on what listed on the card and not the uniform. So Boston appears to be the primary team. However, there is also a Colorado logo on the bottom of the Chauncy card, which to me would make it appropriate to also list Colorado as a team.
|
|
|
|
|
C2Cigars
Posts: 11,467
Joined: Oct 2014
|
| Wednesday, September 7, 2016 2:51 PM | |
I think the answer lies in the fact that the set is listed under "College".
-------------------------------
Someday my cards may double in value and then be worth half of what I paid for them. |
|
|
|
|
C2Cigars
Posts: 11,467
Joined: Oct 2014
|
| Friday, September 9, 2016 8:45 PM | |
Woohoo, now I can sleep again. Found one of them 1991 Pro Set Draft Day. And boy where they wrong, not one correct guess.
-------------------------------
Someday my cards may double in value and then be worth half of what I paid for them. |
|
|
|
|
switzr1
Posts: 6,332
Joined: Dec 2013
|
| Friday, September 9, 2016 10:11 PM | |
Were they 100% wrong about this? They also made a version of 694 that is Russell Maryland Cowboys but it's listed in the regular set on our site, as a variation of 694 Joe Ferguson. I didn't understand everything Pro Set did 25 years ago, so I sure don't remember all the details of where cards came from now.
-------------------------------
I'm going to reevaluate how I collect after the new year. It's just getting way too expensive for the new stuff. Sometimes I just want to buy a pack, not a whole box or even blaster. |
|
|
|
|
C2Cigars
Posts: 11,467
Joined: Oct 2014
|
| Friday, September 9, 2016 10:44 PM | |
I thought there was one missing. Why is it separate from the others? They should all be together either as an insert set or in the base set.
-------------------------------
Someday my cards may double in value and then be worth half of what I paid for them. |
|
|
|
