Posted By | Message |
jefro2878
Posts: 12
Joined: Nov 2014
|
Friday, October 27, 2017 4:29 PM | |
I have been almost a 100% team collector every since I started collecting, but I am leaning towards actually build a set. My question is, based on ease of finding cards and not breaking the bank, which year Topps would be a good set to start on.
Thanks
-------------------------------
I'm with Pete, give me $200 on the Reds.
|
|
|
|
RoundtheDiamond87
Posts: 808
Joined: Oct 2015
|
Friday, October 27, 2017 4:48 PM | |
1987-1991 Topps without a doubt. If you don't want to go after Factory sets, then try 500 ct Vending packs, and if not that, then Wax Boxes, Rack Boxes, or Jumbo Boxes.
Edited on: Oct 27, 2017 - 4:50PM
|
|
|
|
obxyankeefan
Posts: 756
Joined: Aug 2017
|
Friday, October 27, 2017 5:38 PM | |
The 55 has been a fun set for me to try and complete. There is no Mantle in that set, but the Clemente and Koufax rookies will cost you.
More recent and cheaper, 1983 has a good design and three good rookie cards that can be bought without breaking the bank. Between $10-$20 a piece.
|
|
|
|
olerud363
Posts: 287
Joined: Feb 2017
|
Friday, October 27, 2017 8:16 PM | |
If you're looking for cheap cardboard, then go with late-80's or early-90's anything. The Topps Total sets from the early 2000's are good if you're looking for a comprehensive set to capture the most players. Personally I prefer base Topps, which I'd like to work on annually. Lots of people build Topps sets, so there's lots of trading opportunities.
-------------------------------
Canadian member collecting John Olerud, Toronto Blue Jays team sets, and Topps base sets. Always open to trading! Cardboard Corner
|
|
|
|
IfbBirdsCards
Posts: 836
Joined: Aug 2017
|
Friday, October 27, 2017 8:23 PM | |
Like the others have said, the junk wax era (late 80’s-early 90’s) is a good place to start. After that, I would suggest going backwards due to the confusing number of variations and parallels in the current day sets.
-------------------------------
#2 Bowie Baysox, #12 Trey Mancini, & #3 Austin Wynns collector on the site. Also expanding my hockey, MMA, and Hofstra alumni collection. Collecting cards since 2011 (Age 8). -Ian
|
|
|
|
Finestkind
Posts: 591
Joined: Nov 2013
|
Friday, October 27, 2017 8:34 PM | |
I had a lot of fun building a 1967 baseball set.
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
RoundtheDiamond87
Posts: 808
Joined: Oct 2015
|
Friday, October 27, 2017 10:56 PM | |
The '67T set has got to be one of the most difficult sets from the mid-'60s onward.
|
|
|
|
vrooomed
Posts: 14,949
Joined: Dec 2012
|
Saturday, October 28, 2017 12:48 PM | |
If you don't want t obreak the bank, then I definitely recommend the 1987-1991 Topps route. You have 5 sets to choose from that won't cost a lot to put together through packs and/or trades. You will find many of the members here who have plenty of extras who will trade (or sell at a very low price).
I know I have extra complete sets of the 1987 set. I know it's still one of my favorites, and my son (14 years old) really likes (and has for a long time - for him).
-------------------------------
-- Dan -- Note: Please see my profile for more info regarding trading (section updated 3/4/2024). I have added a large portion of my inventory to the site, and currently have trading turned on (details are in my profile).
|
|
|
|
NJDevils
Posts: 6,344
Joined: Sep 2010
|
Saturday, October 28, 2017 12:54 PM | |
Easy and cheapest? Try the 1990 Topps.
|
|
|
|
IfbBirdsCards
Posts: 836
Joined: Aug 2017
|
Saturday, October 28, 2017 1:41 PM | |
I do have to agree that of the ‘87-‘91 sets, 1987 definitely has the best design, in case you are factoring design into your decision. The second best would be ‘91.
-------------------------------
#2 Bowie Baysox, #12 Trey Mancini, & #3 Austin Wynns collector on the site. Also expanding my hockey, MMA, and Hofstra alumni collection. Collecting cards since 2011 (Age 8). -Ian
|
|
|
|