Site Forum

I'm in a dilema about this one CL for the Preferred football. The Memorabilia Die-Cut Booklets has 36 cards in it with different cuts of MEM on each card- IE: ROOKIE, PATRIOTS, WIDEOUTS, etc....AND Thanks to Panini they numbered each card the same in each category: IE: 4K YARDS has 2 cards, numbered 1 and 2, BRONCOS has 2 cards numbered 1 and 2, etc,.. so there are like 14 cards that are numbered #1 and #2.

So-

i can enter the CL with all the Die-cuts on one sheet with the variations in Note2 alphabetically or 

end up creating 18 different categories for the die cuts (Thats how Beckett has it). Keep in mind that the Prime and Super Prime suits would follow as well. So, 3 seperate CL or about 54 CL(a little less as all cards aren't included in the Prime / superprime).

typically for the football books like this, the cards are sequential numbered by either Numbers or Alpha characters, so they can all be in the same set without doubt as to what is what but Noooooooo, lets make 14 #1 cards.. S*&$#!T

below is the link:

http://www.cardboardconnection.com/2016-panini-preferred-football-cards

First thing I say is this:

Have you seen any of these cards yet? Can you verify the numbers are as published here? Panini is very well known (especially on this website) for publishing one thing and printing something completely different.

yes.. went on ebay and checked a few of the cards and how they numbered. 

They should be seperate sets. Even if it is frustrating to list them. On the other hand, they should be easier to complete if it is only one or two cards.

i was unfort thinking of separtly , i currently have the CL done as all one --- take a little to separate the categories

Cut and Paste is your friend :)

grrrrr i think we need to have a class action suit against card companies for ridiculous labeling and redemptions

Yes, separate sets is the way to go. I've worked on getting a couple of the Fabric of the Game sets straightened out and a couple other sets that had different pieces (cards were printed differently) and they were a pain. (It's 10 times worse when the set is already loaded here and you have to move scans and collections - poor Admin!)

And from what I saw, they definitely looked like different sets.