| Posted By | Message |
|
herkojerko
Posts: 722
Joined: Oct 2014
|
| Sunday, February 14, 2016 9:43 AM | |
This card has the same number us-117 as the John Lackey card but the only variation listed is the sabermetrics version
|
|
|
|
|
Colengco90
Posts: 572
Joined: Oct 2014
|
| Sunday, February 14, 2016 11:31 AM | |
this card is actually listed as number 21, notated as UER - Numbered 117 on back
Edited on: Feb 14, 2016 - 11:32AM
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
Colengco90
Posts: 572
Joined: Oct 2014
|
| Sunday, February 14, 2016 11:31 AM | |
http://www.tradingcarddb.com/ViewCard.cfm/sid/94826/cid/6931312/2014-Topps-Update-US-21-Bryan-Holaday
Edited on: Feb 14, 2016 - 11:32AM
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
C2Cigars
Posts: 11,468
Joined: Oct 2014
|
| Sunday, February 14, 2016 11:35 AM | |
The card is incorrectly listed in the database. It's listed as card #US-21. Incorrectly numbered cards should be listed by the number on the back of the card. It should be listed as US-117 (the number on the card) with an UER: "should be card #US-21".
Edited on: Feb 14, 2016 - 11:37AM
-------------------------------
Someday my cards may double in value and then be worth half of what I paid for them. |
|
|
|
|
herkojerko
Posts: 722
Joined: Oct 2014
|
| Sunday, February 14, 2016 11:51 AM | |
Ok. I found another. card us-164 Josh Tomlin is listed under us-311
|
|
|
|
|
vrooomed
Posts: 14,949
Joined: Dec 2012
|
| Sunday, February 14, 2016 12:46 PM | |
Yes, there were 2 cards that were misnumbered inthe 2014 Topps Update set. The checklist here is showing what Topps' checklists (on card) show. TCDB should probably be updated to show reality. Please contact Admin so that it is done correctly. I'd hate to see people's collections get discombobulated.
-------------------------------
-- Dan -- Note: Please see my profile for more info regarding trading (section updated 3/4/2024). I have added a large portion of my inventory to the site, and currently have trading turned on (details are in my profile). |
|
|
|
|
Splinter_9
Posts: 743
Joined: Sep 2013
|
| Sunday, February 14, 2016 1:08 PM | |
1986 Topps is listed the same way. Bobby Wine is listed as #51 (where he was supposed to be) even though he has 57 on the back. Bob Rodgers is listed as 171, even though he has 141 on the back.
http://www.tradingcarddb.com/Errors.cfm/sid/110/1986-Topps
-------------------------------
A man has to have goals — for a day, for a lifetime — and that was mine, to have people say, "There goes Ted Williams, the greatest hitter who ever lived." |
|
|
|
|
Mitch
Posts: 258
Joined: Feb 2016
|
| Wednesday, February 17, 2016 8:51 AM | |
1986 Topps was my first thought too. Frustrating when this happens. I'm kind of surprised it happened on such a recent set. I hadn't noticed this on the 2014 update set yet.
Splinter_9 wrote: 1986 Topps is listed the same way. Bobby Wine is listed as #51 (where he was supposed to be) even though he has 57 on the back. Bob Rodgers is listed as 171, even though he has 141 on the back.
http://www.tradingcarddb.com/Errors.cfm/sid/110/1986-Topps
|
|
|
|
|
