Posted By | Message |
trading4vintage
Posts: 140
Joined: Oct 2016
|
|
|
|
sandyrusty
Posts: 4,655
Joined: Dec 2014
|
Friday, March 8, 2019 3:04 AM | |
Not sure what you are asking here. The 1994 Archives set does not have the 2 Ted Williams cards from the original 1954 set. So the checklist is missing card # 1 and 250 as they were never issued. The master set is 258 cards because there are 2 cards that have ERR/COR or VAR (#246 & 258).
-------------------------------
Bruno -------- Check my Profile page to see my 2023 Goals and my Lists of sets near completion (5 cards or less) or sets getting close (less than 100 cards missing and 75% complete). https://www.tcdb.com/Forum.cfm/Page/B/ID/0/?MODE=VIEW&ThreadID=25745&C=0
|
|
|
|
trading4vintage
Posts: 140
Joined: Oct 2016
|
|
|
|
sandyrusty
Posts: 4,655
Joined: Dec 2014
|
Friday, March 8, 2019 3:20 AM | |
If you mean the originals from 1954,just go to that set here on the database. If in the Archives set,they don't exist. If you mean the ERR and VAR, they are listed in the checklist here.
-------------------------------
Bruno -------- Check my Profile page to see my 2023 Goals and my Lists of sets near completion (5 cards or less) or sets getting close (less than 100 cards missing and 75% complete). https://www.tcdb.com/Forum.cfm/Page/B/ID/0/?MODE=VIEW&ThreadID=25745&C=0
|
|
|
|
Lea DeFoote
Posts: 1,534
Joined: Jul 2012
|
Friday, March 8, 2019 5:12 AM | |
There's a clue in the "Trivia" section of this set. The other three cards were issued by Upper Deck and are listed under the product they were released in here.
-Tom
-------------------------------
Ted Musgrave card collection 98.9% Complete: Cards Known: 1013, Cards Owned: 1002 I prefer the company of people who disagree with me for the right reasons over the company of those who agree with me for the wrong reasons.
|
|
|
|
BOBSCARDZ
Posts: 4,973
Joined: Nov 2014
|
Friday, March 8, 2019 6:00 AM | |
All correct, EXCEPT there are more variations [more than 2] to add. I have them but just haven't added them yet.
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
vrooomed
Posts: 14,956
Joined: Dec 2012
|
Friday, March 8, 2019 6:08 AM | |
The Note2 on several cards in this set were done incorrectly. "With and without ..." is a terrible way of documenting variations, and these look like printing flaws anyway, and should be removed. Do I have a volunteer to clean up this set?
-------------------------------
-- Dan -- Note: Please see my profile for more info regarding trading (section updated 3/4/2024). I have added a large portion of my inventory to the site, and currently have trading turned on (details are in my profile).
|
|
|
|
BOBSCARDZ
Posts: 4,973
Joined: Nov 2014
|
Friday, March 8, 2019 6:51 AM | |
Yes, but depends what you mean by cleanup?
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
vrooomed
Posts: 14,956
Joined: Dec 2012
|
Friday, March 8, 2019 7:40 AM | |
Clean up set = Make all fields in the set (Number, Name, Team, Note, Note2) adherent to the site's guidelines - without exception. Do I have a volunteer?
-------------------------------
-- Dan -- Note: Please see my profile for more info regarding trading (section updated 3/4/2024). I have added a large portion of my inventory to the site, and currently have trading turned on (details are in my profile).
|
|
|
|
switzr1
Posts: 6,332
Joined: Dec 2013
|
Friday, March 8, 2019 11:21 AM | |
As far as the request to link the two checklists together, go vote this upgrade a 10:
https://www.tradingcarddb.com/FeatureTracker.cfm?MODE=VIEW&ID=64&PageIndex=1
It's currently the leading vote-getter. This split-up set would fall into that category.
-------------------------------
I'm going to reevaluate how I collect after the new year. It's just getting way too expensive for the new stuff. Sometimes I just want to buy a pack, not a whole box or even blaster.
|
|
|
|