1991 Fleer Baseball Forum

1991 Fleer #363 Jerry Browne has 2 versions ERR/COR. TCDB lists this card as a UER yet I have 2 cards that clearly show that the dot over the I in "is" is dotted. Would like to have this card added the TCDB.

There seems to be a whole host of different cards that came out of the purple/pink jumbo (ppj) packs. Apparently, they were printed and packaged at a completely different facility.

Several months ago, a very generous member sent me a set made from the ppjs. The set I have had since 1991 is made from standard wax packs.

I just compared the 2 Jerry Browne cards and that is where the difference comes from.

Now, although in this case, the cards can be considered Error and Corrected (since the error was the word "is" missing the dot in the "i", and it was dotted in the other version), most of the cards simply have variations (nothing wrong with one version or the other).

I have held off even looking at the set due to the reaction from members when the 1991 Donruss set was amended to include the different versions. (I honestly thought there might be a revolt if another set was amended in the same fashion.)

It appears that if we add this card, we're going to need to investigate each card in the ppjs. This may create a VAR pairing or ERR/COR pairing for nearly every card (from the reports I have heard).

I have added the Jerry Browne corrected card:

https://www.tradingcarddb.com/ViewCard.cfm/sid/155/cid/13566932 (as [b] version).

I have updated the listing that was there to be the ERR version and numbered as the [a] version.

If I open the 2 sets I have here, this may create a lot more like this.

A lot of good information. I also have a Jeff Ballard card #367 that has the complete ")" after saberhagen that I would like to have added to the set as a corrected version.

With the chance of starting a riot, I think we are obligated to research this set for any variations. I'm sure the '91 Donruss dissenters are saying, "Oh No Not Again". As a TCDB, we should have all cards listed if they meet site requirements. Wouldn't you think? 

Bob, I agree with that sentiment, whether I'd collect them or not is irrelevant.

And I still do intend to research this set, but there have been 500 things that got in the way. There are already a bunch of IRs in for this set, and I'm debating whether to try to do these one at a time or to do all in one big group. Maybe one at a time and no one will notice or complain. :)

I was one of the "voices" on the Donruss issue. 

I think you should do the best you can, to be as close as Donruss as possible Its about consistancy. Why do for 1 set and not the other ? 

Vroomed, I agree with you COMPLETELYYYYYYYYY. Whether, I collect a set or not, means nothing. We as a group need to do the right thing.