Posted By | Message |
C2Cigars
Posts: 11,467
Joined: Oct 2014
|
Friday, January 5, 2018 5:52 AM | |
Can someone explain the difference between the base cards and the no-protector parallels? Are they just base cards with the protective film removed?
http://www.tradingcarddb.com/Inserts.cfm/sid/2758/1998-99-Finest
-------------------------------
Someday my cards may double in value and then be worth half of what I paid for them.
|
|
|
|
Billy Kingsley
Posts: 7,512
Joined: Aug 2011
|
Friday, January 5, 2018 5:58 AM | |
No Protector cards are Finest technology on both sides. They are also printed on plastic. There are several scans in the album that are base cards with the cover removed. Wrong, but better scans than the base scans. I've been meaning to notify Admin but hadn't gotten around to it. Look at any I posted to see what they should look like.
-------------------------------
VERY slow trading due to health problems. Not transferrable so safe to trade with, just moving is painful and can't always access the cards. Cardboard History My COMC New Collection Website: Cardboard History Gallery (Still under construction) Tips on how to make your scans look like the card does in hand (No more washed out, fuzzy scans!):
|
|
|
|
Billy Kingsley
Posts: 7,512
Joined: Aug 2011
|
|
|
|
C2Cigars
Posts: 11,467
Joined: Oct 2014
|
Friday, January 5, 2018 6:16 AM | |
I knew you'd know Billy. An Inaccuracy Report brought this up. The submitter thinks the "No-Protector" parallel is just base cards with the protective film removed.
This explanation should be put in the Release Notes so members know the difference between a base card and a No-Protector card. The "No-Protector" name makes it sound like nothing more than the protective film removed.
How's this sound for a Release Note? "Issued with no protective film, cards have the Finest-technology coating on both sides and are printed on plastic cardstock; they are NOT base cards with the protective film removed"
Edited on: Jan 5, 2018 - 6:40AM -------------------------------
Someday my cards may double in value and then be worth half of what I paid for them.
|
|
|
|
vrooomed
Posts: 14,949
Joined: Dec 2012
|
Friday, January 5, 2018 7:02 AM | |
I like the wording. If this is true for baseball too, that should be added there as well as I know there was at least one baseball set issued as a no-protector set. (And other sports?)
-------------------------------
-- Dan -- Note: Please see my profile for more info regarding trading (section updated 3/4/2024). I have added a large portion of my inventory to the site, and currently have trading turned on (details are in my profile).
|
|
|
|
Billy Kingsley
Posts: 7,512
Joined: Aug 2011
|
|
|
|
NJDevils
Posts: 6,344
Joined: Sep 2010
|
Friday, January 5, 2018 3:22 PM | |
I know I have the head of a pumpkin, but where are the "release notes"?
|
|
|
|
87Pack
Posts: 39
Joined: Jul 2017
|
Friday, January 5, 2018 3:28 PM | |
It is the same for 1998 Finest Football as well.
-------------------------------
Collecting Green Bay Packers cards
|
|
|
|
C2Cigars
Posts: 11,467
Joined: Oct 2014
|
Friday, January 5, 2018 3:53 PM | |
A good example is the 1990 Topps football. The base cards you will see it in the Overview. The Inserts and Related they show up under the set title in the listings.
-------------------------------
Someday my cards may double in value and then be worth half of what I paid for them.
|
|
|
|
switzr1
Posts: 6,332
Joined: Dec 2013
|
Friday, January 5, 2018 5:48 PM | |
1998 Baseball had these. And guess who knew the answer to my question four years ago?!?!
http://www.tradingcarddb.com/Forum.cfm/Page/S/ID/1144/?MODE=VIEW&ThreadID=1016#4329
-------------------------------
I'm going to reevaluate how I collect after the new year. It's just getting way too expensive for the new stuff. Sometimes I just want to buy a pack, not a whole box or even blaster.
|
|
|
|