| Posted By | Message |
|
cnangle
Posts: 1,127
Joined: Nov 2011
|
| Thursday, January 25, 2018 5:29 PM | |
Anyone know why the Cleveland Browns and Washington Redskins cards are listed as UERs? There isn't an annotion in the note 2 field for the UER.
-------------------------------
My two-cents is worth slightly more than a penny. -- Chad -- |
|
|
|
|
C2Cigars
Posts: 11,514
Joined: Oct 2014
|
| Thursday, January 25, 2018 6:11 PM | |
Browns 316 Darden, Tom should be spelled "Thom"
Redskins 510 Taylor, Charlie should be spelled "Charley"
Both UERs are carryovers from the player's base cards.
Good catch. I fixed them.
Edited on: Jan 25, 2018 - 6:15PM
-------------------------------
Someday my cards may double in value and then be worth half of what I paid for them. |
|
|
|
|
.jpg)
glennchannell
Posts: 471
Joined: Aug 2017
|
| Thursday, January 25, 2018 6:12 PM | |
For card #316, it's a spelling error. The correct spelling of his name is THOM DARDEN. They left the "H" out of his name...
|
|
|
|
|
cnangle
Posts: 1,127
Joined: Nov 2011
|
| Thursday, January 25, 2018 6:31 PM | |
We got some smart folks on this site! Thanks!
-------------------------------
My two-cents is worth slightly more than a penny. -- Chad -- |
|
|
|
|
captkirk42
Posts: 2,270
Joined: May 2011
|
| Saturday, March 30, 2019 12:34 PM | |
Team checklists. There are two VAR of the checklists dealing with the asterisks * one asterisk vs two asterisks on the back on the copyright line. I was wondering if maybe that is also the difference between the regular release (one asterisk) and the through the mail only version (2 asterisks). Since I only have a few of the one asterisks I can't verify what the 2 asterisk cards look/feel like. I was noticing the scans fort the 2 asterisks have a lighter colored back.
-------------------------------
I collect: Baseball, Football, Hockey, Mostly Vintage pre1980, My Homie teams - Washington/Baltimore Teams Senators (Twins, Rangers), Expos/Nationals, Redskins, Capitals, Bullets/Wizards - HOFers - Non-sport (mostly TV shows and movies). My Trade List is very much a work in progress CaptKirk42s Trading Card Blog Curly W Cards Strive For '65 YouTube klandersen42 |
|
|
|
|
C2Cigars
Posts: 11,514
Joined: Oct 2014
|
| Saturday, March 30, 2019 1:04 PM | |
Since each card has the same two VARs, they should be separate listings. I would suspect the lighter backs (two asterisks) are probably from the Mail-in checklists.
captkirk42 wrote:
Team checklists. There are two VAR of the checklists dealing with the asterisks * one asterisk vs two asterisks on the back on the copyright line. I was wondering if maybe that is also the difference between the regular release (one asterisk) and the through the mail only version (2 asterisks). Since I only have a few of the one asterisks I can't verify what the 2 asterisk cards look/feel like. I was noticing the scans fort the 2 asterisks have a lighter colored back.
Edited on: Mar 30, 2019 - 1:12PM
-------------------------------
Someday my cards may double in value and then be worth half of what I paid for them. |
|
|
|
|
captkirk42
Posts: 2,270
Joined: May 2011
|
| Saturday, March 30, 2019 3:46 PM | |
That is what I was thinking. Makes me wish sometimes that insert sets could be given sub-set lists for variants.
-------------------------------
I collect: Baseball, Football, Hockey, Mostly Vintage pre1980, My Homie teams - Washington/Baltimore Teams Senators (Twins, Rangers), Expos/Nationals, Redskins, Capitals, Bullets/Wizards - HOFers - Non-sport (mostly TV shows and movies). My Trade List is very much a work in progress CaptKirk42s Trading Card Blog Curly W Cards Strive For '65 YouTube klandersen42 |
|
|
|
