1990 Score Football Forum

Greetings. Please take a look at this thread that I recently started.

https://www.tcdb.com/Forum.cfm/Page/S/ID/3253/?MODE=VIEW&ThreadID=42463&C=3

The Mosebar and Cofer errors are pictured in the master checklist. Does anyone have the corrected versions? Does anyone have the Ferrel Edmunds with the Adidas logo visible on his sock? At the very least, should the Cofer and Mosebar be added as UER's until someone produces photographic evidence of the other versions? 

Thanks,

V

Photographic evidence:

COFER

https://www.comc.com/Cards/Football/1990/Score_-_Base/3851/Mike_L_Cofer_(LINEBACKER_on_Back)/658841

MOSEBAR

https://www.comc.com/Cards/Football/1990/Score_-_Base/530/Don_Mosebar/658986  (2nd copy listed) 

EDMUNDS

https://www.comc.com/Cards/Football/1990/Score_-_Base/3491/Ferrell_Edmunds_(Adidas_logo_on_left_sock)/658805

FYI, these corrected versions are less common as they were later corrections. 

I added the Cofer ERR and COR.  

For Mosebar, I’m not sure that the “error” version wasn’t just something blocking the ink on part of the m in September, so not sure how that works with this site.  Will let that decision go to someone with more expertise. 

For Edmunds, I personally don’t see the difference.  I don’t doubt it is there, I just don’t know what I am looking for.

Well, FWIW, the 68 Bench RC has a VAR where the a "t" in the bio is partially blocked. I've seen both of these in person.

"tne Reds" / "the Reds"

Tscastle wrote:

I added the Cofer ERR and COR.  

For Mosebar, I’m not sure that the “error” version wasn’t just something blocking the ink on part of the m in September, so not sure how that works with this site.  Will let that decision go to someone with more expertise. 

For Edmunds, I personally don’t see the difference.  I don’t doubt it is there, I just don’t know what I am looking for.

"Adidas logo" (actually the team's wordmark): 

Supposed "airbrushed", looks like nothing more than ink bleed. If they were going to take the time and expense to alter the printing plates (you can't "airbrush" a metal plate), why didn't they do a complete obliteration of the logo. Or more importantly, why would they bother to remove their logo.

Tscastle wrote:

I added the Cofer ERR and COR.  

For Mosebar, I’m not sure that the “error” version wasn’t just something blocking the ink on part of the m in September, so not sure how that works with this site.  Will let that decision go to someone with more expertise. 

For Edmunds, I personally don’t see the difference.  I don’t doubt it is there, I just don’t know what I am looking for.

"Adidas logo" is how it has been cataloged for nearly twenty years, not my application.

Pretty convenient that the "ink bleed" only affects the little sock logo. But again, this is not my discovery and they have been circulating on want lists, checklists and sold online for a very long time. It is obvious that two distinct versions exist, no variance in either type. 

The majority of the Mosebar copies are missing the portion of the 'm' in September. The missing area does not deviate in shape or location. All Septen ber versions are the same. 

But as I stated in the other thread on these, it is mostly pointless to try and get stuff like this added. Great exhibition as to why that is.

I don't think anyone was arguing strictly against addition. There is already precedent for Mosebar to be added. For Edmund, could just be clarity of what is trying to be entered. We have precedent there also for airbrushed items.