Posted By | Message |
switzr1
Posts: 6,332
Joined: Dec 2013
|
Tuesday, July 5, 2016 4:36 PM | |
Could somebody besides me have a look at this checklist of this parallel set? Does it look right? It has Members Only parallels of all the insert sets tacked on to the end of the Members Only parallel of the base, as though it were one continuous set, despite all being numbered differently. I don't think it looks right, but maybe I am missing something. Also, I don't want to change it myself and risk messing up someone else's collection. But maybe nothing needs changed.
-------------------------------
I'm going to reevaluate how I collect after the new year. It's just getting way too expensive for the new stuff. Sometimes I just want to buy a pack, not a whole box or even blaster.
|
|
|
|
tonym
Posts: 1,192
Joined: Jan 2012
|
Tuesday, July 5, 2016 4:48 PM | |
beckett has it as a run-on, but that could be of the wording too. I'm thinking it should be separated. the BB (Bowmans Best) is typically a different type of set, and looking at the pics, they are.
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
switzr1
Posts: 6,332
Joined: Dec 2013
|
Tuesday, July 5, 2016 4:59 PM | |
Right. The Bowman's Best that aren't Members Only look nothing like the base Stadium Club. I asssume the Members Only is just the same thing with a gold foil M.O. stamp added. Also, the BU and BK prefixes don't exist in the Bowman's Best, so I had an awful time finding my Reggie White in the database. Beckett probably invented those because each card has a Black and a Blue, and the players are different depending on the color. Thanks for looking Tony. This would certainly be a job for Admin to fix, since it involves moving cards that people have added to their collections.
-------------------------------
I'm going to reevaluate how I collect after the new year. It's just getting way too expensive for the new stuff. Sometimes I just want to buy a pack, not a whole box or even blaster.
|
|
|
|
vrooomed
Posts: 14,949
Joined: Dec 2012
|
Tuesday, July 5, 2016 5:44 PM | |
I think the Member's Only sets were issued only as a factory set, which included the full cast of inserts. This was also the case with the baseball sets. And we have the baseball sets listed the same way (base cards and inserts, all one set).
-------------------------------
-- Dan -- Note: Please see my profile for more info regarding trading (section updated 3/4/2024). I have added a large portion of my inventory to the site, and currently have trading turned on (details are in my profile).
|
|
|
|
switzr1
Posts: 6,332
Joined: Dec 2013
|
Tuesday, July 5, 2016 5:54 PM | |
OK thanks for the info Dan.
-------------------------------
I'm going to reevaluate how I collect after the new year. It's just getting way too expensive for the new stuff. Sometimes I just want to buy a pack, not a whole box or even blaster.
|
|
|
|
ranfordfan
Posts: 4,975
Joined: Jun 2014
|
Tuesday, July 5, 2016 10:23 PM | |
Hmmmm, not sure how the hockey sets were released but I think they are seperated. Check 94-95 Stadium Club, it has a Member's Only Parallel and I think its one of the sets that are broken up. Just sayin ............ =) lol
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
vrooomed
Posts: 14,949
Joined: Dec 2012
|
Tuesday, July 5, 2016 10:33 PM | |
The hockey folk always have to be different. :)
(And before you say anything, look at what items I was just uploading to the site - 8 Marty Lapointe 1/1s, among the hundreds of other cards (many of them SN10). In other words, I'm hockey folk, too.)
-------------------------------
-- Dan -- Note: Please see my profile for more info regarding trading (section updated 3/4/2024). I have added a large portion of my inventory to the site, and currently have trading turned on (details are in my profile).
|
|
|
|