| Posted By | Message |
|
Billy Kingsley
Posts: 7,512
Joined: Aug 2011
|
| Saturday, March 7, 2015 10:16 PM | |
Hi Folks, I don't
know much about
hockey, but I was
given almost 3000
of them in January.
Among them were
three cards from
this set with
numbers higher than
650 - #656 674 and
684 to be specific.
Where can I find
them on the
Database? I also
have a 2013-14
Panini Prizm card
numbered higher
than 300 as well,
that is the same
situation. Thanks
in advance!
-------------------------------
VERY slow trading due to health problems. Not transferrable so safe to trade with, just moving is painful and can't always access the cards. Cardboard History My COMC New Collection Website: Cardboard History Gallery (Still under construction) Tips on how to make your scans look like the card does in hand (No more washed out, fuzzy scans!): |
|
|
|
|
waxandwaxpax
Posts: 6
Joined: Jan 2015
|
| Sunday, March 8, 2015 7:10 AM | |
Hey Billy. Not a set I collected but I will look into it! (Started re-collecting hockey in 2008 after a hiatus since 1998!)
Edited on: Mar 8, 2015 - 7:13AM
|
|
|
|
|
captkirk42
Posts: 2,269
Joined: May 2011
|
| Sunday, March 8, 2015 12:21 PM | |
Hmm for the Prizm set cardboardconnection seems to stop at 300 (the Rookies are 201-300) as well as most places I could find... meanwhile over at Zistle that checklist goes to 11 er 400 and appears they are mostly more Rookies. Could #s above 300 be Short prints or SuperduperStupid Short Prints? This is the type of stuff that confuses me and annoys me, just as the thousands of "variations" that sometimes are only different because the player's name is in Gold instead of silver, or chrome instead of not-chrome. Which dang version of the card do I have?
-------------------------------
I collect: Baseball, Football, Hockey, Mostly Vintage pre1980, My Homie teams - Washington/Baltimore Teams Senators (Twins, Rangers), Expos/Nationals, Redskins, Capitals, Bullets/Wizards - HOFers - Non-sport (mostly TV shows and movies). My Trade List is very much a work in progress CaptKirk42s Trading Card Blog Curly W Cards Strive For '65 YouTube klandersen42 |
|
|
|
|
switzr1
Posts: 6,332
Joined: Dec 2013
|
| Sunday, March 8, 2015 5:19 PM | |
Who are the players Billy?
-------------------------------
I'm going to reevaluate how I collect after the new year. It's just getting way too expensive for the new stuff. Sometimes I just want to buy a pack, not a whole box or even blaster. |
|
|
|
|
IronButt
Posts: 23
Joined: Jan 2014
|
| Sunday, March 8, 2015 5:32 PM | |
A search of "2013 Score" under the hockey category at Beckett shows 750 cards in the base set and the black and gold parallel sets. I checked cards 649 and 650 to see if they matched the checklist here, and it looks good...... Please double check me, because I'm not a hockey collector myself. Hope this helps a little. |
|
|
|
|
switzr1
Posts: 6,332
Joined: Dec 2013
|
| Sunday, March 8, 2015 5:35 PM | |
Billy, it appears the Score high numbers and Prizm high numbers were inserted into 2013-14 Panini Rookie Anthology. I only see 686-750 for Score in the database, but it should be 651-750 according to Cardboard Connection [see link]. I didn't check Prizm on our site. It looks like the whole point of this product was getting the high number rookie cards of the other Panini releases of that year. Interesting concept. I was unaware that anything like this had ever been tried. A small Series 2 for each of that year's Panini releases, but all available in the same packs. I actually kind of like that.
www.cardboardconnection.com/2013-14-panini-rookie-anthology-hockey-cards
-------------------------------
I'm going to reevaluate how I collect after the new year. It's just getting way too expensive for the new stuff. Sometimes I just want to buy a pack, not a whole box or even blaster. |
|
|
|
|
Billy Kingsley
Posts: 7,512
Joined: Aug 2011
|
|
|
|
|
switzr1
Posts: 6,332
Joined: Dec 2013
|
| Monday, March 9, 2015 10:58 AM | |
Considering I just opened a card of Vlade Divac in a 2014-15 pack yesterday, you would think there would be room for Elton Brand.
-------------------------------
I'm going to reevaluate how I collect after the new year. It's just getting way too expensive for the new stuff. Sometimes I just want to buy a pack, not a whole box or even blaster. |
|
|
|
|
beansballcardblog
Posts: 142
Joined: May 2011
|
| Saturday, October 14, 2017 9:43 AM | |
There are checklist errors on a couple of the set. Does anyone want to look into them? I discovered them as I was trying to add scans and update my collection. On the Alternate Back and Red parallel sets, card numbers 581-590 are omitted from the checklist.
-kin
|
|
|
|
|
Billy Kingsley
Posts: 7,512
Joined: Aug 2011
|
|
|
|
