2013 Panini Crown Royale Football Forum

The 2 SN10 Green Rookie Autos you linked are from these two sets:

https://www.tcdb.com/ViewCard.cfm/sid/92345/cid/6831392/2013-Panini-Crown-Royale---Rookie-Signatures-Green-187-Ryan-Spadola?PageIndex=1

https://www.tcdb.com/ViewCard.cfm/sid/148064/cid/10940066/2013-Panini-Crown-Royale---Crown-Royale-Rookie-Signatures-Green-202-Andre-Ellington?PageIndex=1

Please remember the base rookies (non auto) subset https://www.cardboardconnection.com/2013-panini-crown-royale-football-cards#post_anchor_1_127795 (101-200) does have a Green SN10 parallel. 

https://www.tcdb.com/ViewCard.cfm/sid/92316/cid/6831032/2013-Panini-Crown-Royale---Green-(Die-Cut-Crown)-158-Kevin-Minter?PageIndex=1

https://www.comc.com/Cards/Football/2013/Panini_Crown_Royale_-_Base_-_Green_Die-Cut_Crown/158/Kevin_Minter/7430264

Remember, we treat the Signature (Base Rookies Subset) as an insert set, and not a parallel set.

We also treat the Crown Royale Rookie Sigantures (Cards 201-240) as insert cards when they are not (AU, MEM).

It appears you're saying COMC got it wrong (or at least different from TCDb). Is that what you are saying? Like many TCDb members, I go back and forth between TCDb and COMC for various reasons so it matters (to me at least) . I still remain unconvinced by your argument. I believe COMC's info is more accurate than TCDb's.

If I understand correctly from the 4th post (yours), you say the OP's card is this one (which has no card image, unfortunately):

https://www.tcdb.com/ViewCard.cfm/sid/92316/cid/8656294/2013-Panini-Crown-Royale---Green-(Die-Cut-Crown)-208-Eddie-Lacy?PageIndex=1

The checklist from your linked card has both SN10 and SN25COMC's.

Here's a link to COMC's version of your linked set: 2013 Panini Crown Royale - Rookie - Green Die-Cut Crown Signatures. All of these are SN'd to 10.

The OP's card is SN'd to 25. Would you agree that on COMC's site, it belongs on this COMC page?: 2013 Panini Crown Royale - Rookie - Silhouettes Green Autographs (These are all SN'd to 25.) 

Maybe the bottom line is that Panini really just confused the heck out of COMC or TCDb or both. Thanks for a nice discussion.