| Posted By | Message |
|
sandyrusty
Posts: 4,676
Joined: Dec 2014
|
| Wednesday, August 17, 2016 10:03 AM | |
I just uploaded the images for card #135. Problem is that all checklists I can find says it is Cal Ripken; the card I have is Ken Caminiti. As you can see on the back image, the card I uploaded is #135. Anyone know of such an error or is it an error in the checklists that are out there? Help would be appreciated.
-------------------------------
Bruno -------- Check my Profile page to see my 2023 Goals and my Lists of sets near completion (5 cards or less) or sets getting close (less than 100 cards missing and 75% complete). https://www.tcdb.com/Forum.cfm/Page/B/ID/0/?MODE=VIEW&ThreadID=25745&C=0 |
|
|
|
|
vrooomed
Posts: 14,980
Joined: Dec 2012
|
| Wednesday, August 17, 2016 11:27 AM | |
Ripken is 135.
Caminiti is supposed to be 115, but is also 135.
I just edited the Notes to show the UER and reason. Please upload Ken to 115.
-------------------------------
-- Dan -- Note: Please see my profile for more info regarding trading (section updated 3/4/2024). I have added a large portion of my inventory to the site, and currently have trading turned on (details are in my profile). |
|
|
|
|
C2Cigars
Posts: 11,517
Joined: Oct 2014
|
| Wednesday, August 17, 2016 11:29 AM | |
Ken Caminiti is supposed to be #115. Not sure if they corrected and actually made a #115. Upload your Caminiti images to card #135a Ken Caminiti UER and then have Admin remove the other images.
Edited on: Aug 17, 2016 - 4:14PM
-------------------------------
Someday my cards may double in value and then be worth half of what I paid for them. |
|
|
|
|
C2Cigars
Posts: 11,517
Joined: Oct 2014
|
| Wednesday, August 17, 2016 11:33 AM | |
I believe Admin told me cards are supposed to be listed by the card number printed on them. I'll double-check with them.
-------------------------------
Someday my cards may double in value and then be worth half of what I paid for them. |
|
|
|
|
sandyrusty
Posts: 4,676
Joined: Dec 2014
|
| Wednesday, August 17, 2016 11:44 AM | |
I haven't been able to find any reference to any such error neither in any reference publication. Anyone on Beckett? I think the norm is that it would be listed as #135 UER and in the notes would be explained that it should be #115
-------------------------------
Bruno -------- Check my Profile page to see my 2023 Goals and my Lists of sets near completion (5 cards or less) or sets getting close (less than 100 cards missing and 75% complete). https://www.tcdb.com/Forum.cfm/Page/B/ID/0/?MODE=VIEW&ThreadID=25745&C=0 |
|
|
|
|
vrooomed
Posts: 14,980
Joined: Dec 2012
|
| Wednesday, August 17, 2016 1:09 PM | |
You guys are right - Admin should delete the entry for 115. (However, there are other sets where the intended number is the number listed. We need to fix them when we find them again!)
-------------------------------
-- Dan -- Note: Please see my profile for more info regarding trading (section updated 3/4/2024). I have added a large portion of my inventory to the site, and currently have trading turned on (details are in my profile). |
|
|
|
|
C2Cigars
Posts: 11,517
Joined: Oct 2014
|
| Wednesday, August 17, 2016 1:23 PM | |
Reminds me of suggestion. I've seen this done at other site's checklists when there is skip numbers. They put "Never Released", "Not Printed", "Not Used", or similiar for card numbers that were never actually printed. I always thought that in an instance like this something like, "See card #135" in the Name field would be helpful.
-------------------------------
Someday my cards may double in value and then be worth half of what I paid for them. |
|
|
|
|
sandyrusty
Posts: 4,676
Joined: Dec 2014
|
| Wednesday, August 17, 2016 2:24 PM | |
I reported it to Admin, explained the issue and that there were now 2 entries for Caminiti's card but left them to decide which one they wished to use. I know of another similar issue with a Canseco card in the1992 Stadium Club set. It is numbered #370 but should have been #597. # 597 was never issued (so if you are holding an incomplete set with that one card missing, you will never complete it - or it is complete, whichever way you wish to look at it).
I am just surprised that almost 20 years after this Finest set was issued, no one has ever made the realization.
-------------------------------
Bruno -------- Check my Profile page to see my 2023 Goals and my Lists of sets near completion (5 cards or less) or sets getting close (less than 100 cards missing and 75% complete). https://www.tcdb.com/Forum.cfm/Page/B/ID/0/?MODE=VIEW&ThreadID=25745&C=0 |
|
|
|
