Random Card of the Day

Thursday, November 29, 2018

Year: 2002-03

“ The foreground shot is fine but the background is too busy in my opinion. ” -John Kerry

“ I really liked this set when it came out, and I still do, despite it being a player in front of a fake background. I think now it's more nostalgia than design. ” -Billy Kingsley

“ ummm...no ” -C2Cigars

“ I believe it was someone's first time with photoshop and just wanted to go crazy with every background, font, effect, etc.., they could find. The sad part is what could have been a good looking card is killed by the effects. Sadly as bad as the front is the back is 10x worse. I would give the front a 2 and the back a 1. ” -davidhandberry

“ As an insert, it is all good except for the use of the same picture on the back. I didn't remember he played for the Hawks, I only remember the Vancouver Grizzlies. ” -muskie027

“ Eh front a bit busy. At least all the essential IDs are there: player name, team name. Back OK except for repeat of photo.and continuation of strange design. ” -captkirk42

“ Looks like he's being beamed up to The Enterprise ” -Trapper9

Additional Comments

Posted By

Message

beardogfarm

Posts: 16
Joined: Nov 2017

Thursday, November 29, 2018 9:18 AM
I disagree with the negatives. Front has a full-body action-shot, set name & year, team and player name and number, none of those is obnoxiously placed. Back has plenty of room for stats, has a prominent card number and team logo and player position are also shown. A "1" for the back? This card is at least a "5" all-around.

pjdionne12

Posts: 161
Joined: Aug 2017

Thursday, November 29, 2018 9:21 AM
02-03 Would have been anyone's first time with photoshop. I like the player's # included on the front.

Random Card of the Day

Thursday, November 29, 2018

Additional Comments

Account

Browse

Features

Resources

General Info