Wednesday, December 2, 2020
Year: 1995
Set: Topps (Rate)
Card: #428 Jim Bullinger
“ Not a bad set. Good looking cards. ” -trauty
3
“ I actually like the back design better than the front for this year of Topps. ” -Billy Kingsley
3
“ It's almost strange to see a normal base card get COTD. I don't know how I feel about that. ” -Soarin22
2
“ what happened from 91-96.... was everyone on crack? ” -parsley24
“ One of my favorite sets, because the Spectralight / Cyberstats / Blackback parallel is one of my favorite parallels. ” -abide
1
“ If I had to come up with a design for Topps, this wouldn't be it. ” -Phil
“ I imagine this is divisive, but I appreciate they at least tried something different. I like the back, and that there are 3 different images used front & back. ” -jackal726
2
“ 1995 Topps baseball. I think 95 was one of the last years I was active w/every year of sports cards until my return almost 10 years later in late 2004. I don't like the font for the player name. Back is pretty good. ” -captkirk42
1
“ I can't say anything good about the specific card, because it's a Cub. But the 1995 Topps design, used in at least 3 sports, was an improvement over 1994. ” -switzr1
2
“ This design was one of the better ones from the 1990's imo ” -IfbBirdsCards
2
“ This set has never really grown on me. I think it's the font choice for the name on front, but maybe it's the rough-cut border of the photo. I don't know, but something just strikes me as wrong. ” -kents_stuff
1
“ Not the greatest design that Topps put out in the 90s, but original and pretty cool. ” -Corky
“ Love the card, has everything I want in a card nd does it style! They cram a lot of stats on the back and still make it readable. Excellent card! ” -Camstone
3