Bob, we do not have distaste for errors and variations. Admin has clearly stated in the FAQ the rules about wrong backs here:
https://www.tradingcarddb.com/FAQ.cfm?ITEM=WrongBacks
In there, is the text:
Since this is due to a misfire during the printing process and not a failure of the proofing/editing process, we do not attempt to catalog these sorts of cards on this site due to their random nature.
And Admin has mentioned this is other places (forums, e-mails) that printing errors like no foil or missing one color of ink are in this same "genre" of variations.
These are the rules of the website. Plain and simple. I have decided that by being here, I will abide by those rules, and while accepting higher levels of responsibility here, I have essentially committed to helping enforce those rules.
Please stop the attempts to circumvent these rules. It's getting very tiresome. By publicly bringing up another ink variation that you know well and good shouldn't be listed on here, you stir the pot with the others who think that an extra ink splatter has caused a must-have variation. I recently saw a meme that stated "He who stirs the pot should be made to lick the spoon." And I think we all understand which type of pot I speak of here. Bob, you have a ton of great ideas and contributions. I have a ton of respect for you, both as a member of the hobby community but also as a man. You're a great guy, I honestly mean that. You drive me crazy with these posts.
If you want to know if something should be listed on the site, and you don't know if the FAQs were clear enough, ask Admin directly. Please, I ask you not to drag it through the forums again. Thanks.
-- Dan --
Note: Please see my profile for more info regarding trading (section updated 3/4/2024). I have added a large portion of my inventory to the site, and currently have trading turned on (details are in my profile).