| Posted By | Message |
|
baseballcardstoreca
Posts: 1,316
Joined: Sep 2019
|
| Wednesday, October 25, 2023 5:08 AM | |
Almost certainly there are others
Please say it ain't so?
Could it be that Bill Barilko's RC could be 1991-92 Pro Set?
What do you think it should or could or can't be?
Seeing how the rules and criteria have changed so much through the years should we leave it as is,
it's a non-topic and good to carry on or do we just grab a food issue and call it an RC or XRC or ?RC ?
-------------------------------
Paypal: dwarfie01@gmail.com E-mail transfer: dwarfie01@gmail.com US address: Get it Shipped 3142 20 Wintersport Ln Ste 115 Williston,VT 05495-8145 Canadian address: Nancy Swart 69 Papineau Valleyfield,QC J6S4J7 Canada https://baseballcardstore.ca/ https://www.facebook.com/baseballcardstoreca https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCUV3sfM3EZDPQu3g2O2YCdw Twitter: @baseballcardst1 TIKTOK.COM/@baseballcardstore.ca |
|
|
|
|
baseballcardstoreca
Posts: 1,316
Joined: Sep 2019
|
|
|
|
|
BuccaneersDen
Posts: 658
Joined: Jun 2018
|
| Wednesday, October 25, 2023 6:01 AM | |
I am only going to guess, so it may not be the right answer. The 91/92 Pro-Set card was part of the Hockey Hall of Fame subset, whereas the 03/04 Parkie was an actual base card in a licensed release. He also has a Beehive from the 1940's but I don't believe those count as you had to send away a label from the product and could request any specific card you wanted.
-------------------------------
"They've done studies, you know. Sixty percent of the time it works every time." - Brian Fantana from the movie Anchorman |
|
|
|
|
Statsnerd
Posts: 1,266
Joined: Feb 2022
|
| Wednesday, October 25, 2023 6:04 AM | |
It is foolish for us to apply the rules of today and try to enforce them throughout the past.
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
Bowersbird
Posts: 481
Joined: May 2020
|
|
|
|
|
C2Cigars
Posts: 11,503
Joined: Oct 2014
|
| Wednesday, October 25, 2023 10:11 AM | |
Because it's not a player's card.
-------------------------------
Someday my cards may double in value and then be worth half of what I paid for them. |
|
|
|
|
C2Cigars
Posts: 11,503
Joined: Oct 2014
|
| Wednesday, October 25, 2023 10:14 AM | |
No post-career (inactive) cards get an RC or XRC note.
-------------------------------
Someday my cards may double in value and then be worth half of what I paid for them. |
|
|
|
|
Statsnerd
Posts: 1,266
Joined: Feb 2022
|
| Wednesday, October 25, 2023 11:51 AM | |
Question on this.
Is this tcdb rule or some other rule I can read on?
I agree no RC should be after his playing career
C2Cigars wrote:
No post-career (inactive) cards get an RC or XRC note.
Edited on: Oct 25, 2023 - 11:51AM
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
BuccaneersDen
Posts: 658
Joined: Jun 2018
|
| Wednesday, October 25, 2023 11:53 AM | |
Yes because it's an In Action subset card, even though it's the only IA card in that set. O-pee-chee did these quite often in their regular hockey sets, and as an insert set in recent years. To be a RC it has to be a player card in a major release, not like a Post Cereal or Cracker Jack or Hostess Twinkies no matter how good the product tastes.
-------------------------------
"They've done studies, you know. Sixty percent of the time it works every time." - Brian Fantana from the movie Anchorman |
|
|
|
|
Statsnerd
Posts: 1,266
Joined: Feb 2022
|
| Wednesday, October 25, 2023 11:57 AM | |
But if no cards exist that's silly that we would say no RC for you even if it is a hostess.. that should be rule of thumb but some sense needs to be applied in rare cases
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
