1972 TCMA 1933 Delong (R333) Reprints Baseball Forum

Is this the same as 

https://www.tcdb.com/Checklist.cfm/sid/231711/

  No, not the same set. The TCMA 1972 (?) set exists and does not have the the word reprint on the backs. Every image needs removed. The images for the other set appear to be correct (without looking at each one), but are newly added and disgraceful. Washed out images and the zoom feature either doesn't work properly or not at all. That's what happens with these Point Farmers' images, so eager to get points they don't even care if the images are correct or what they look like.
  If the correct images had been submitted in the first place you probably wouldn't have asked the question. And by the way Billy Kingsley is the actual all-time points leader on TCDB,................................................................by a mile.

I actually have one WITHOUT reprint written on back - which is what got me trying to figure out the differences between these. Would seem I have the ‘72. I will add the image when I can. Thanks for the help!

  Hopefully they will remove these FAKE images from the 1972 set and You can start the adding of the correct images. It appears that the other sets' images were "farmed" (stolen) from the 1972 set's images and the farmer just happened to get the correct images, albeit poor quality. Farmed Images from Fake Wrong Images. Amen

Well... does my card, and this set by extension, not qualify for TCDB since it does not have any REPRINT designation?

I'm not into baseball so I have little knowledge about these cards.   I'm just looking at it as an outsider. 

We have 3 sets original,  72 TCMA Reprint (without reprint on the card).   Then the Reprint set (with no year of reprint or manufacture tied to it).   

On the 72 set there is no note stating the cards do not have "Reprinted" printed on the card but does show in the title.    I can see why images were added as they were. (Farmed or not).   Is there a way to tell the cards in this set from the original?    If not, the farmers can use the original images.  If there is a different like the color of the stock/ink or whatever.  It should be noted.

You can see why someone gets confused.  Things like this happens on other sets also.

Check the Change Log and you'll see who uploaded both sets.

From the FAQ:

For reprinted cards, the following criteria must be met:

• The set must be produced by a registered company and added to the site organically by collectors (not by individuals of the company seeking to advertise or promote their product).
• The cards should have visual indication that they are reprints, unless the cards were produced by the original company.