2017 Panini National Treasures Baseball Forum

I am having some mixed up feelings when it comes to the listing of Supplied Cards (cards from year x included in a set year x+1). Should they really be listed or should they be seen as duplicates (maybe linked) from the preview years set. All I know is that it ruines the completion % of a PC collection and I personally would prefer to not list them as additional cards.

What do you mean? Any idea to handle this better?

https://www.tradingcarddb.com/Checklist.cfm/sid/161196/2017-Panini-National-Treasures---Supplied-Card

If the cards were included in the peroduct, they get listed with that product.

Many collectors are not fans of the 1/1s and printing plates, and feel the inclusion of them in their collection listing "takes away" from their completiin percentage. But, that's not how the database operates. It's a record of what is out there and where it came from.

Keep in mind the cards were not actually released in year "x". We have them listed in year "x+1", because they were actually inserted into that set. These types of Panini sets are horrible to catalog on here. Card numbers are always incorrect from their checklist.

Thanks guys.

@SunDevilCollection. All I know is, that cards listed in the 2016 NT checklist are to a certain amount only included in the 2017 NT set. No clue how to verify that. I am 100% sure since I tracked that down for my PC (Kepler). There are about 50% (18 cards) which are listed in the 2016 NT set but only be inserted in the 2017 NT boxes. Not sure how to handle that. 

I fully agree on the numbering, this is just terrible.