Random Card of the Day

“ YAY a Bucco! However, not something I would look to collect. I ain't never been into these newer Bowman cards. I know some fellers go nutsy cuckoo over these cards at the LCS. Buy boxes of them, open them right in the store and leave most of the cards there, never understood that. ” -Gunny

“ OK I like the basic design for the Base. I do not, however like the Refractor "Crushed Ice" or "Sparkle Diamond" Prism effect this refractor has going on. It really (multiple really ad-infinitum or at least 3 or 4 multiples of really) Back typical back really wish there was just one background color. Don't get me started on Bowman Prospects card "numbers" with all these "P"s and "C"s they use for their Prospects releases. ” -captkirk42

“ I think the Atomic Refractor is one of the better parallels in my opinion just because of how nice they look in person. Parallel aside, I think 2018 Bowman is nice because of how simple it is ” -mkb

Continue the conversation (3 more comments)...

“ Busy design and way too much foil. Must be a Pacific product. ” -hamrlik22

“ Nice card. I don't like the sideways font for the player's name on the front, nor do I like the "signature" style of it (ditto with the name and position on the back). Back looks OK but having stats would be nice not just a season highlights bio. Also a solid color background works best not one of these fancy design ones. ” -captkirk42

“ Every sportcard I've ever seen where the guy's name is Sergei ... he's wearing skates! ” -BuccaneersDen

“ The more I see Pacific, the more I wish I had been around for them. ” -muskie027

“ I am not a hockey collector, but a good looking card is a good looking card. Pacific made some of the best looking cards and this is no exception. ” -YoRicha

Continue the conversation (4 more comments)...

“ Great photo. OK design. ” -parsley24

“ Nice 2011 Topps card. When did they start stamping Factory sets? Oh wait it was a special Anniversary Year never mind. ” -captkirk42

“ A great design that feels like it will be considered a classic from this era of card collecting. IMHO ” -koloth42

“ Is there a clinical name for the condition where the right half of my brain sees this and starts ranting about unnecessary, money-grab, slight variant sets, while simultaneously the left half of my brain makes a note to pull up this set and add the Braves cards to my wantlist? More importantly, is there medication? ” -jackal726

“ I always liked the really simple design of 2011, I just think it looks nice ” -mkb

Continue the conversation (4 more comments)...

“ One of my favorite sets, large team sets and some great pictures are a joy to look at over and over again ” -aussiewayne

“ This is a nice card. Pro Set always did give you a lot of information in the write up on the back. ” -Brendan Barrick

“ Nice action picture, like most in this set. Plus, you learn that Swilling had to write his number on his towel to keep his teammates from using it. Terrific! ” -hamrlik22

“ Great set.... sleeper of an investment. Also i have a ton for trade. please take. ” -parsley24

“ Excellent Pro Set card. I love these things. Still need to complete all of them. NFL that is not the Soccer or Hockey sets. ” -captkirk42

“ Love this set. Started my first stint of football card collecting with 1989 Pro Set. ” -freakizon

“ I remember this set from way back when i collected football. It gives me some nostalgia. Living in Louisiana for the past 10 years I am sick of the Saints, especially the Cowboys vs. Saints arguments that friends and coworkers have. ” -davidhandberry

Continue the conversation (4 more comments)...

“ This set was great for autographs. [though I'm not a guy that chases autos TTM or IP] "Mat" finish on the cards as opposed to glossy. I guess the hobby didn't like that, because I can't think of another set like it. ” -abide

“ I tend to flip-flop about this set. Looks wise it is very plain, but I do like me some good old Fleer from time to time. Plus I like the flat (aka Non-Glossy) finish to the cards. ” -captkirk42

Continue the conversation (4 more comments)...

“ It's nice to see an actual plain ol' base card on here from time to time. You can only see so many supa dupa-fly mega retro-liquifactors numbered to 67 before fatigue starts to set in. ” -mkaz80

“ Like the RC logo. That mishmash of a design at the bottom takes up way too much of the card and draws way too much attention to itself. The focus of the card is the player, not your yearly design framing Topps! ” -Tscastle

“ Not a fan of the design, nor when topps just takes what they did the year before, but make it look different. ” -parsley24

“ Modern Topps design that I still haven't warmed up to much. It is OK but very tiring. Back very boring. I think if Topps were still using the card stock that was used pre-mid 1980s the background colors for these last few years of Topps sets would look like the Donruss backs from the 1980s. ” -captkirk42

“ I like this set, but found the design was not much different from 2016-2018. Nice to see a regular base set card on the RCOTD. ” -muskie027

Continue the conversation (2 more comments)...

“ I like this card. Adrian Murrell did have a nice career. ” -Brendan Barrick

“ One of the best modern Bowman designs in my opinion. ” -dbro02

“ Nice design for a lower budget. Unlike Upper Deck, whose design work on the low cost product were abysmal. ” -hamrlik22

“ I like the look of this Bowman design, but don't like the team name and position being sideways in a strange font. Also player name hard to read in this scan. I forget it the cards in hand are hard to read. Back looks OK but could be improved, stats should be more than just the one season. ” -captkirk42

“ only if it was written in comic sans could this font choice be any worse. Boo on this design. ” -parsley24

“ i've always enjoyed the look of this set ” -Thunderfoot

Continue the conversation (2 more comments)...

“ This is an ok design. I like the picture on the front, but the lack of stats on the back reduces my impression of this card. ” -Brendan Barrick

“ Nice 1990s College Football Card. Interesting photo makes him look real small with a GIANT Blocker. ” -captkirk42

Continue the conversation (4 more comments)...

“ This is a pretty nice card. One problem is that for some of the other Upper Deck releases, you could barley see the serial numbering on the back because it was so dark. This isn't a problem with this card because where the serial numbering is, it stands out. ” -jdogg1228

“ "Up and at them!"--Radioactive Man ” -rmpaq5

“ Gross ” -parsley24

Continue the conversation (4 more comments)...