Random Card of the Day



Thursday, January 28, 2016

Year: 1947-66

Set: Exhibits (W461) (Rate)

Card: #NNO Choo Choo Coleman


“ Nice old school card. ” -uncaian

“ Now that is the epitome of cool! ” -RoyalChief

“ Best wishes to who? The Exhibit Supply Company? ” -carthage44

“ Sharp looking piece, but I feel compelled to fill in the information missing from the back: Batted .178 in 277 plate appearances over 106 games with the hapless 1963 Mets (record 51-111). I don't study catchers very closely, but 15 errors and 11 passed balls in 487 total chances don't sound like reasons to overlook his offensive ineptitude. His mlb.com bio points out that in 1963, he was hit by pitches on five occasions. That was 16th-best in the NL, which probably earned him one of those purple "participant" ribbons normally reserved for elementary school athletics. ” -dilemma19

“ Great nickname. I guess those early Mets had to do something while losing 100 games. ” -NJDevils

“ Clearly the best name ever. Don't even try to say otherwise. Is that writing supposed to be there? ” -DarkSide830

“ Underappreciated set. ” -Dave Sosidka


Additional Comments

Posted ByMessage

Mike67

Posts: 284
Joined: Nov 2011
Thursday, January 28, 2016 8:42 AM

I like Coco Laboy.. 


   

captkirk42

Posts: 2269
Joined: May 2011
Thursday, January 28, 2016 8:49 AM

Huh I guess when I wrote my comment I didn't submit, probably hit "preview". Dang it. Oh there is no "preview" maybe my comment was empty or nasty. I thought I said it was a cool vintage post card. Oh well.


Edited on: Jan 28, 2016 - 8:51AM
-------------------------------

I collect: Baseball, Football, Hockey, Mostly Vintage pre1980, My Homie teams - Washington/Baltimore Teams Senators (Twins, Rangers), Expos/Nationals, Redskins, Capitals, Bullets/Wizards - HOFers - Non-sport (mostly TV shows and movies).

My Trade List is very much a work in progress

CaptKirk42s Trading Card Blog Curly W Cards Strive For '65 YouTube klandersen42


   

NJDevils

Posts: 6344
Joined: Sep 2010
Thursday, January 28, 2016 9:46 AM

In Korean,  surnames come first.  Thus, Shin-Soo Choo ,  Shin-Soo is the family name and Choo is his given name.   Now if someone would only nickname him "Choo-Choo",   he would be "Choo-choo Shin-soo Choo".    Yes, I have too much time on my hands.


Edited on: Jan 28, 2016 - 11:06AM

   

Lea DeFoote

Posts: 1534
Joined: Jul 2012
Thursday, January 28, 2016 10:29 AM

Anybody know why the back image is displaying larger than the front?


-------------------------------

Ted Musgrave card collection 98.9% Complete: Cards Known: 1013, Cards Owned: 1002

I prefer the company of people who disagree with me for the right reasons over the company of those who agree with me for the wrong reasons.


   

Finestkind

Posts: 591
Joined: Nov 2013
Thursday, January 28, 2016 1:12 PM

His nick name could have been this


-------------------------------

Dave


   

skrezyna23

Posts: 145
Joined: Jan 2015
Wednesday, November 15, 2017 6:04 PM

I was doing a search for anything Korean and I saw this come up. Wanted to correct you on your post. Surnames do come first in Korean but in your example of Shin-Soo Choo, it is incorrect. Choo is the family name and Shin-Soo is his given name. Thus in Korean, his name is Choo Shin-Soo. But when translated to English, surname comes last, Shin-Soo Choo.

NJDevils wrote:

In Korean,  surnames come first.  Thus, Shin-Soo Choo ,  Shin-Soo is the family name and Choo is his given name.   Now if someone would only nickname him "Choo-Choo",   he would be "Choo-choo Shin-soo Choo".    Yes, I have too much time on my hands.


-------------------------------

   


Log in or register to continue.



  

Copyright © 2024 Trading Card Database LLC
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.