Card Identification Forum

So many factors come into play here. Inking seems to always be an issue. I feel intentional or unintentional they are different cards from the inking standpoint, Why are the bold backs different? Bold ink print, Right? How can you say one inking is any different for this set, but 1 can be listed and the other can't.....doesn't seem right.

Were the glow/no glow and bold/not bold variations going to be added to the ckecklist?  I can provide visual proof of the variations for the Rickey Henderson cards.

As Bruno stated in the other thread, the glow ink versions are not listable here. The dark logo versions are already listed (currently) as a parallel set. As you can see above, I have the Henderson AS cards. That is not the issue.

The Dark Logo variation already exists here, link below. As of now there is no intent to add glowback versions. The reason being, and someone corrcet me if I'm wrong here, is because the glowbacks were the unintentional result of a different ink used. As such, they aren't listable here unless Admin makes the determination otherwise. The Dark Logos were an intentional printing difference and, as such, are considered variations tha tare listable.

https://www.tcdb.com/Checklist.cfm/sid/133609/1991-Topps---Dark-Topps-Logo-Variation