Posted By | Message |
avsbruins65
Posts: 2,147
Joined: Sep 2008
|
Wednesday, February 2, 2022 2:14 PM | |
These series of cards have multiple versions and should probably shown as versions but are listed as Parallels. Mainly talking the print versions, A, B, C and Japan.
Wanted to get a concensous prior to submitting an inaccuracy report for changes.
The print versions have the same checklists but minor corrections to the text on the back to show updated stats.
Mark
-------------------------------
Trying to acquire one card for every for every set, insert, parralle, minor, euro, team issue, oddball etc sets produced for Hockey. Been an interesting project.
|
|
|
|
avsbruins65
Posts: 2,147
Joined: Sep 2008
|
Thursday, February 3, 2022 7:24 AM | |
-------------------------------
Trying to acquire one card for every for every set, insert, parralle, minor, euro, team issue, oddball etc sets produced for Hockey. Been an interesting project.
|
|
|
|
set_builder39
Posts: 339
Joined: May 2019
|
Thursday, February 3, 2022 7:34 AM | |
-------------------------------
---------- Currently not trading but will consider buy/sell offers.
|
|
|
|
Tscastle
Posts: 866
Joined: Mar 2021
|
Thursday, February 3, 2022 8:05 AM | |
What an interesting question. Who would be much happier if all the 1988-1992 Donruss dot/no dot and */no * variations were listed as parallels? I think many of us.
|
|
|
|
captkirk42
Posts: 2,269
Joined: May 2011
|
Thursday, February 3, 2022 8:14 AM | |
Interesting. It is sort of like the difference between Topps and OPC versions really. The only difference seems to be where they were printed. Where as a parallel version usually has some kind of visual difference.
-------------------------------
I collect: Baseball, Football, Hockey, Mostly Vintage pre1980, My Homie teams - Washington/Baltimore Teams Senators (Twins, Rangers), Expos/Nationals, Redskins, Capitals, Bullets/Wizards - HOFers - Non-sport (mostly TV shows and movies). My Trade List is very much a work in progress CaptKirk42s Trading Card Blog Curly W Cards Strive For '65 YouTube klandersen42
|
|
|
|
avsbruins65
Posts: 2,147
Joined: Sep 2008
|
Thursday, February 3, 2022 8:36 AM | |
Usually the only difference is updated text on the back between each version. Annotated by Print A, Print B, sometimes Print C. Printed in Italy and Printed in Japan for the decks (set) 1-10 only.
-------------------------------
Trying to acquire one card for every for every set, insert, parralle, minor, euro, team issue, oddball etc sets produced for Hockey. Been an interesting project.
|
|
|
|
switzr1
Posts: 6,332
Joined: Dec 2013
|
Thursday, February 3, 2022 9:10 AM | |
As the one who created most of these checklists, many years ago, I say go for it. I was probably told to do it that way at the time, but the site has changed a lot since then.
-------------------------------
I'm going to reevaluate how I collect after the new year. It's just getting way too expensive for the new stuff. Sometimes I just want to buy a pack, not a whole box or even blaster.
|
|
|
|
unkilldoo
Posts: 356
Joined: Feb 2018
|
Thursday, February 3, 2022 12:30 PM | |
|
|
|
|
unkilldoo
Posts: 356
Joined: Feb 2018
|
Thursday, February 3, 2022 12:32 PM | |
Not sure why these scans are stretched out like that. I'm having a hard time locating these.
|
|
|
|
anabwana
Posts: 140
Joined: Nov 2020
|
Thursday, February 3, 2022 12:37 PM | |
Not sure about the French version but the Finnish sets have completely different checklists with at least a third of the cards being completely unique so they should not be classed as parallels or versions of the English cards. Even the cards that exist in the Finnish sets and other languages tend to have the text rewritten in Finnish, for example in that Namath card is describing some basic rules of American Football which is not in the French text.
unkilldoo wrote:
Where would these fit in?
Edited on: Feb 3, 2022 - 12:38PM
|
|
|
|